Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Zeck: Modern board meeting platform that replaces static decks with interactive updates, AI-generated minutes, smart agendas, pre-voting, and digital voting. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist Condens when transcribing and tagging user interview recordings matters most, and Zeck when generating board minutes and capturing votes during governance meetings matters most. Run both through a week of actual calls to see which suits your workflow.
UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository.
Modern board meeting platform that replaces static decks with interactive updates, AI-generated minutes, smart agendas, pre-voting, and digital voting.
Condens is a user research platform that helps research teams store, analyze, share, and scale customer data in one collaborative hub. It supports importing recordings, notes, and user feedback, and provides automated multilingual transcription with AI-powered speaker recognition and automated captions. For analysis, Condens offers a split-screen interface that lets researchers review raw data and tag it simultaneously, along with AI-driven pattern identification across datasets and quick generation of evidence-backed findings. All research lives in a searchable, centralized repository with cross-project insight discovery, filtering, and role-based access control for managing confidential data. Condens emphasizes real-time collaboration, allowing multiple team members to build, edit, and tag data together, and integrates with tools such as Slack, Teams, Figma, and Miro, plus whiteboard functionality for interactive sessions. Additional AI capabilities include automated bookmarking, summarization, and pattern detection across multiple studies. Positioned as a lean, practical tool for researchers who want to move quickly, Condens aims to streamline the path from interview transcripts to shareable insights without the overhead of heavier enterprise systems. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Zeck is a board management platform built to modernize how companies prepare for and run board meetings. Instead of distributing static slide decks, board leaders create mobile-first interactive updates that directors can read, comment on, and engage with before the meeting. Its pre-vote feature lets boards move routine discussion and approvals ahead of time so live meetings focus on strategy rather than procedure. Zeck's AI capabilities are aimed at the board workflow: it can generate board updates from reports and quick notes, summarize key takeaways from data and charts into concise points for directors, and automatically produce board minutes from agenda blocks, vote records, and discussions. Smart agendas help teams structure the meeting, while digital voting and an automated minutes book keep governance records, approvals, and historical documentation centralized without manual note-taking. The platform also includes real-time commenting throughout materials and engagement analytics, plus passwordless sign-in for security. Zeck positions itself as a consumer-style, visually modern alternative to traditional board portals and is geared toward startups and growth-stage companies, with thousands of CEOs and board members using it. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Condens is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Zeck is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Condens | Zeck |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automated multilingual transcription with speaker recognition and captions | AI-generated board minutes from agenda blocks, votes, and discussions |
| Standout feature | Split-screen interface for simultaneous data review and tagging | AI-assisted board update creation from reports and notes |
| Team usage | AI-driven pattern identification across datasets | AI summaries of key takeaways from data and charts |
| Integrations | Searchable centralized repository with cross-project discovery | Smart agendas and interactive, mobile-first board updates |
| Languages & capture | Real-time collaborative analysis and tagging | Pre-vote and digital voting with a centralized automated minutes book |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, Teams, Figma, and Miro plus whiteboards | Real-time commenting across board materials |
Condens
Choose Condens if you need transcribing and tagging user interview recordings — strengths include fast, practical workflow from transcript to tagged insights.
Zeck
Choose Zeck if you need preparing and distributing interactive board updates before a meeting — strengths include purpose-built to streamline board meeting prep, execution, and minutes.
Condens
Zeck
It depends on your workflow. Condens is strong for transcribing and tagging user interview recordings, while Zeck is strong for preparing and distributing interactive board updates before a meeting. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Condens is a free tier with paid upgrades and Zeck is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Sure. Running both makes sense when their strengths don't overlap and the budget allows.
More head-to-head comparisons involving Condens and Zeck.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Conveo: AI-led qualitative research platform that runs video, voice, and text interviews and analyzes every signal for insights at speed. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Convin: AI conversation intelligence platform for contact centers and sales teams that records, transcribes, and scores calls, chats, and emails. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Convo: Bot-free real-time AI meeting assistant for Mac and Windows that transcribes calls, suggests replies live, and syncs notes to Slack, Notion, and HubSpot. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. CraftNote: A cross-platform AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes conversations, identifies speakers, and can join calls on major meeting platforms. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Cresta: Enterprise contact-center AI platform combining real-time agent assist, autonomous AI agents, and conversation intelligence. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Cuebo: AI sales coaching platform with a roleplay arena of video-avatar buyers, automated course generation, and call analysis. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Daglo: Korean all-in-one AI notetaker by Action Power that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and lectures, with strong Korean recognition and post-recording tools. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Deepting: Real-time AI transcription and meeting summary app for meetings, interviews, and lectures across mobile and web. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Demodesk: AI sales meeting platform that records, transcribes, coaches reps, and automates note-taking, follow-ups, and CRM updates. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Deposely: AI deposition platform for litigators covering prep, real-time insights, and transcript review and summaries. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.