Condens and Cuebo are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Cuebo: AI sales coaching platform with a roleplay arena of video-avatar buyers, automated course generation, and call analysis. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Condens when transcribing and tagging user interview recordings matters most, and Cuebo when reps practicing pitches and full demos against video-avatar buyers matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository.
AI sales coaching platform with a roleplay arena of video-avatar buyers, automated course generation, and call analysis.
Condens is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Cuebo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Condens | Cuebo |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automated multilingual transcription with speaker recognition and captions | AI Roleplay Arena with customizable video-avatar buyer personas built from real conversations |
| Standout feature | Split-screen interface for simultaneous data review and tagging | Instant post-call feedback and scoring, including screen-share demo practice |
| Team usage | AI-driven pattern identification across datasets | AI Trainer that auto-generates training modules from decks, PDFs, and playbooks |
| Integrations | Searchable centralized repository with cross-project discovery | Smart Coach for personalized coaching with objection-handling drills and call memory |
| Languages & capture | Real-time collaborative analysis and tagging | Call recording and transcription for manager review of customer interactions |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, Teams, Figma, and Miro plus whiteboards | Management dashboards, gamification, and support for 20+ languages |
Condens
Choose Condens if you need transcribing and tagging user interview recordings — strengths include fast, practical workflow from transcript to tagged insights.
Cuebo
Choose Cuebo if you need reps practicing pitches and full demos against video-avatar buyers — strengths include video-avatar personas and screen sharing enable realistic demo practice.
Condens
Cuebo
It depends on your workflow. Condens is strong for transcribing and tagging user interview recordings, while Cuebo is strong for reps practicing pitches and full demos against video-avatar buyers. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Condens is a free tier with paid upgrades and Cuebo is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.