Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Scribewave: Scribewave is a European AI transcription platform that converts audio and video into editable text across dozens of languages and dialects, with speaker diarization and an AI assistant for summaries and notes. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist Condens when transcribing and tagging user interview recordings matters most, and Scribewave when universities and qualitative researchers transcribing recorded sessions with speaker labels matters most. Try them side by side on real calls before deciding — needs vary by team.
UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository.
Scribewave is a European AI transcription platform that converts audio and video into editable text across dozens of languages and dialects, with speaker diarization and an AI assistant for summaries and notes.
Condens is a user research platform that helps research teams store, analyze, share, and scale customer data in one collaborative hub. It supports importing recordings, notes, and user feedback, and provides automated multilingual transcription with AI-powered speaker recognition and automated captions. For analysis, Condens offers a split-screen interface that lets researchers review raw data and tag it simultaneously, along with AI-driven pattern identification across datasets and quick generation of evidence-backed findings. All research lives in a searchable, centralized repository with cross-project insight discovery, filtering, and role-based access control for managing confidential data. Condens emphasizes real-time collaboration, allowing multiple team members to build, edit, and tag data together, and integrates with tools such as Slack, Teams, Figma, and Miro, plus whiteboard functionality for interactive sessions. Additional AI capabilities include automated bookmarking, summarization, and pattern detection across multiple studies. Positioned as a lean, practical tool for researchers who want to move quickly, Condens aims to streamline the path from interview transcripts to shareable insights without the overhead of heavier enterprise systems. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Scribewave is an AI transcription platform from Belgian company Quantum Noodle BV (Leuven/Beerzel) that automatically converts audio and video files into editable text. Users upload recordings, the AI transcribes them, and an integrated editor lets people review and correct the text while audio plays, with click-to-audio sync so clicking a word jumps to that moment in the recording. The platform supports a wide range of languages and dialects, positioning itself around linguistic diversity and regional and mixed-language speech rather than English alone. It includes speaker diarization, custom vocabularies to preserve names and jargon, batch uploads, and exports to formats such as Word, Google Docs, and subtitle files (SRT/VTT), plus the ability to render captioned videos. An AI assistant can answer questions about a transcript and generate summaries, chapters, and meeting notes with timecode references. Scribewave emphasizes data ownership, European servers, and GDPR compliance, and states it does not use customer content to train its models. It targets journalists, researchers, universities, and content creators.
Best suited for
Condens is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Scribewave is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Condens | Scribewave |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automated multilingual transcription with speaker recognition and captions | AI transcription of audio and video files into editable text across many languages and dialects |
| Standout feature | Split-screen interface for simultaneous data review and tagging | Speaker diarization and speaker identification, including handling overlapping speech |
| Team usage | AI-driven pattern identification across datasets | Synchronized editor with click-to-audio word sync for review and correction |
| Integrations | Searchable centralized repository with cross-project discovery | AI assistant that answers questions and generates summaries, chapters, and meeting notes with timecodes |
| Languages & capture | Real-time collaborative analysis and tagging | Custom vocabularies to preserve names, jargon, and domain terms |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, Teams, Figma, and Miro plus whiteboards | Exports to Word, Google Docs, PDF, and subtitle formats (SRT/VTT), plus captioned video output |
Condens
Choose Condens if you need transcribing and tagging user interview recordings — strengths include fast, practical workflow from transcript to tagged insights.
Scribewave
Choose Scribewave if you need journalists and researchers transcribing and reviewing interviews across multiple languages — strengths include strong multilingual and dialect coverage with a focus on smaller and regional languages.
Condens
Scribewave
It depends on your workflow. Condens is strong for transcribing and tagging user interview recordings, while Scribewave is strong for journalists and researchers transcribing and reviewing interviews across multiple languages. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Condens is a free tier with paid upgrades and Scribewave is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Sure. Running both makes sense when their strengths don't overlap and the budget allows.
More head-to-head comparisons involving Condens and Scribewave.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Conveo: AI-led qualitative research platform that runs video, voice, and text interviews and analyzes every signal for insights at speed. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Convin: AI conversation intelligence platform for contact centers and sales teams that records, transcribes, and scores calls, chats, and emails. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Convo: Bot-free real-time AI meeting assistant for Mac and Windows that transcribes calls, suggests replies live, and syncs notes to Slack, Notion, and HubSpot. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. CraftNote: A cross-platform AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes conversations, identifies speakers, and can join calls on major meeting platforms. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Cresta: Enterprise contact-center AI platform combining real-time agent assist, autonomous AI agents, and conversation intelligence. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Cuebo: AI sales coaching platform with a roleplay arena of video-avatar buyers, automated course generation, and call analysis. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Daglo: Korean all-in-one AI notetaker by Action Power that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and lectures, with strong Korean recognition and post-recording tools. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Deepting: Real-time AI transcription and meeting summary app for meetings, interviews, and lectures across mobile and web. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Demodesk: AI sales meeting platform that records, transcribes, coaches reps, and automates note-taking, follow-ups, and CRM updates. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Deposely: AI deposition platform for litigators covering prep, real-time insights, and transcript review and summaries. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.