Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Meeting Ink: Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist Condens when transcribing and tagging user interview recordings matters most, and Meeting Ink when cross-language teams that want transcripts and translated summaries from video calls matters most. Run both through a week of actual calls to see which suits your workflow.
UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository.
Taiwan-built AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes online and in-person meetings, with strong Traditional Chinese, Taiwanese, and Hakka support.
Condens is a user research platform that helps research teams store, analyze, share, and scale customer data in one collaborative hub. It supports importing recordings, notes, and user feedback, and provides automated multilingual transcription with AI-powered speaker recognition and automated captions. For analysis, Condens offers a split-screen interface that lets researchers review raw data and tag it simultaneously, along with AI-driven pattern identification across datasets and quick generation of evidence-backed findings. All research lives in a searchable, centralized repository with cross-project insight discovery, filtering, and role-based access control for managing confidential data. Condens emphasizes real-time collaboration, allowing multiple team members to build, edit, and tag data together, and integrates with tools such as Slack, Teams, Figma, and Miro, plus whiteboard functionality for interactive sessions. Additional AI capabilities include automated bookmarking, summarization, and pattern detection across multiple studies. Positioned as a lean, practical tool for researchers who want to move quickly, Condens aims to streamline the path from interview transcripts to shareable insights without the overhead of heavier enterprise systems. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Meeting Ink is an AI meeting assistant developed in Taiwan that automatically records, transcribes, and summarizes both online video conferences and in-person meetings. It connects with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex, and can also record directly from a browser tab or take uploaded audio files. After a meeting, it produces contextual AI summaries using customizable templates, identifies and separates speakers, and lets users edit transcripts. A distinguishing strength is its localized language handling: alongside Traditional Chinese, English, and Japanese, it recognizes Taiwanese (Hokkien) and Hakka dialects, which sets it apart from most international tools that focus only on Mandarin. It offers multi-language translation, real-time captioning during meetings, custom industry terminology recognition, and Google Calendar integration so a bot can automatically join scheduled meetings. The product is available across web, iOS, Android, Windows, and Mac, plus a Chrome extension. Meeting Ink is actively operating with a free tier and several paid subscription plans, priced in New Taiwan Dollars, and draws on cloud and AI infrastructure from providers such as Microsoft Azure, AWS, OpenAI, and NVIDIA. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Condens is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Condens | Meeting Ink |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automated multilingual transcription with speaker recognition and captions | Automatic transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Standout feature | Split-screen interface for simultaneous data review and tagging | Integrations with Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, and Webex plus browser-tab recording |
| Team usage | AI-driven pattern identification across datasets | Taiwanese (Hokkien) and Hakka dialect recognition in addition to Traditional Chinese, English, and Japanese |
| Integrations | Searchable centralized repository with cross-project discovery | Speaker identification, real-time captions, and multi-language translation |
| Languages & capture | Real-time collaborative analysis and tagging | Customizable summary templates and custom terminology recognition |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, Teams, Figma, and Miro plus whiteboards | Google Calendar integration with automatic bot attendance |
Condens
Choose Condens if you need transcribing and tagging user interview recordings — strengths include fast, practical workflow from transcript to tagged insights.
Meeting Ink
Choose Meeting Ink if you need taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology — strengths include strong support for taiwanese and hakka dialects that most global tools lack.
Condens
Meeting Ink
It depends on your workflow. Condens is strong for transcribing and tagging user interview recordings, while Meeting Ink is strong for taiwanese teams needing meeting notes that capture local dialects and terminology. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Condens is a free tier with paid upgrades and Meeting Ink is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
You can — some teams pair them when each covers a different part of the meeting workflow.
More head-to-head comparisons involving Condens and Meeting Ink.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Conveo: AI-led qualitative research platform that runs video, voice, and text interviews and analyzes every signal for insights at speed. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Convin: AI conversation intelligence platform for contact centers and sales teams that records, transcribes, and scores calls, chats, and emails. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Convo: Bot-free real-time AI meeting assistant for Mac and Windows that transcribes calls, suggests replies live, and syncs notes to Slack, Notion, and HubSpot. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. CraftNote: A cross-platform AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes conversations, identifies speakers, and can join calls on major meeting platforms. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Cresta: Enterprise contact-center AI platform combining real-time agent assist, autonomous AI agents, and conversation intelligence. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Cuebo: AI sales coaching platform with a roleplay arena of video-avatar buyers, automated course generation, and call analysis. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Daglo: Korean all-in-one AI notetaker by Action Power that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and lectures, with strong Korean recognition and post-recording tools. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Deepting: Real-time AI transcription and meeting summary app for meetings, interviews, and lectures across mobile and web. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Demodesk: AI sales meeting platform that records, transcribes, coaches reps, and automates note-taking, follow-ups, and CRM updates. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Deposely: AI deposition platform for litigators covering prep, real-time insights, and transcript review and summaries. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.