Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Lyrebird Health: Lyrebird Health is an AI medical scribe that listens during clinical consultations and automatically generates transcribed, structured clinical notes and documents. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist Condens when transcribing and tagging user interview recordings matters most, and Lyrebird Health when generating referral letters, medical certificates, and other clinical documents from consultation audio matters most. Run both through a week of actual calls to see which suits your workflow.
UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository.
Lyrebird Health is an AI medical scribe that listens during clinical consultations and automatically generates transcribed, structured clinical notes and documents.
Condens is a user research platform that helps research teams store, analyze, share, and scale customer data in one collaborative hub. It supports importing recordings, notes, and user feedback, and provides automated multilingual transcription with AI-powered speaker recognition and automated captions. For analysis, Condens offers a split-screen interface that lets researchers review raw data and tag it simultaneously, along with AI-driven pattern identification across datasets and quick generation of evidence-backed findings. All research lives in a searchable, centralized repository with cross-project insight discovery, filtering, and role-based access control for managing confidential data. Condens emphasizes real-time collaboration, allowing multiple team members to build, edit, and tag data together, and integrates with tools such as Slack, Teams, Figma, and Miro, plus whiteboard functionality for interactive sessions. Additional AI capabilities include automated bookmarking, summarization, and pattern detection across multiple studies. Positioned as a lean, practical tool for researchers who want to move quickly, Condens aims to streamline the path from interview transcripts to shareable insights without the overhead of heavier enterprise systems. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Lyrebird Health is an AI medical scribe built for healthcare practitioners. It listens in the background during a consultation, transcribes the conversation into text in real time, and then generates a structured clinical note (such as SOAP format or a custom template) within seconds of the consultation ending. Beyond notes, it can draft documents like referral letters and medical certificates ready for review. The product runs in the browser (Chrome recommended) on desktop and mobile, supports terminal-server and remote-desktop environments, and is compatible with in-person and telehealth (phone and video) consultations. It offers direct dictation and AI-driven "smart dictate" modes, learns each clinician's documentation style, and includes a translation feature for non-English consults. Lyrebird integrates with electronic medical record systems including Best Practice, Genie/Gentu, and FHIR-compliant systems for one-click note transfer. It is aimed at doctors, specialists, nurses, allied health professionals, dentists, psychologists, and other clinical roles across solo practices, clinics, and enterprise healthcare organizations.
Best suited for
Condens is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Lyrebird Health is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Condens | Lyrebird Health |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automated multilingual transcription with speaker recognition and captions | Background listening with real-time voice-to-text transcription during consultations |
| Standout feature | Split-screen interface for simultaneous data review and tagging | Automatic generation of structured clinical notes (SOAP and customizable templates) |
| Team usage | AI-driven pattern identification across datasets | Drafting of clinical documents such as referral letters and medical certificates |
| Integrations | Searchable centralized repository with cross-project discovery | EMR integrations including Best Practice, Genie/Gentu, and FHIR-compliant systems for one-click transfer |
| Languages & capture | Real-time collaborative analysis and tagging | Direct dictate and AI-powered smart dictate modes |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, Teams, Figma, and Miro plus whiteboards | Telehealth-compatible and browser-based with desktop and mobile support |
Condens
Choose Condens if you need transcribing and tagging user interview recordings — strengths include fast, practical workflow from transcript to tagged insights.
Lyrebird Health
Choose Lyrebird Health if you need automating clinical note-taking for doctors and specialists during in-person or telehealth consultations — strengths include purpose-built for clinical documentation and adapts to each clinician's note-taking style.
Condens
Lyrebird Health
It depends on your workflow. Condens is strong for transcribing and tagging user interview recordings, while Lyrebird Health is strong for automating clinical note-taking for doctors and specialists during in-person or telehealth consultations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Condens is a free tier with paid upgrades and Lyrebird Health is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
You can — some teams pair them when each covers a different part of the meeting workflow.
More head-to-head comparisons involving Condens and Lyrebird Health.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Conveo: AI-led qualitative research platform that runs video, voice, and text interviews and analyzes every signal for insights at speed. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Convin: AI conversation intelligence platform for contact centers and sales teams that records, transcribes, and scores calls, chats, and emails. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Convo: Bot-free real-time AI meeting assistant for Mac and Windows that transcribes calls, suggests replies live, and syncs notes to Slack, Notion, and HubSpot. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. CraftNote: A cross-platform AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes conversations, identifies speakers, and can join calls on major meeting platforms. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Cresta: Enterprise contact-center AI platform combining real-time agent assist, autonomous AI agents, and conversation intelligence. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Cuebo: AI sales coaching platform with a roleplay arena of video-avatar buyers, automated course generation, and call analysis. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Daglo: Korean all-in-one AI notetaker by Action Power that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and lectures, with strong Korean recognition and post-recording tools. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Deepting: Real-time AI transcription and meeting summary app for meetings, interviews, and lectures across mobile and web. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Demodesk: AI sales meeting platform that records, transcribes, coaches reps, and automates note-taking, follow-ups, and CRM updates. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Deposely: AI deposition platform for litigators covering prep, real-time insights, and transcript review and summaries. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.