Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Gladia: Developer-focused speech-to-text API with real-time and async transcription, diarization, and meeting-bot integrations. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist Condens when transcribing and tagging user interview recordings matters most, and Gladia when adding live captions and transcripts to video-conferencing products matters most. Test each on your own meetings; the right choice tends to become obvious quickly.
UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository.
Developer-focused speech-to-text API with real-time and async transcription, diarization, and meeting-bot integrations.
Condens is a user research platform that helps research teams store, analyze, share, and scale customer data in one collaborative hub. It supports importing recordings, notes, and user feedback, and provides automated multilingual transcription with AI-powered speaker recognition and automated captions. For analysis, Condens offers a split-screen interface that lets researchers review raw data and tag it simultaneously, along with AI-driven pattern identification across datasets and quick generation of evidence-backed findings. All research lives in a searchable, centralized repository with cross-project insight discovery, filtering, and role-based access control for managing confidential data. Condens emphasizes real-time collaboration, allowing multiple team members to build, edit, and tag data together, and integrates with tools such as Slack, Teams, Figma, and Miro, plus whiteboard functionality for interactive sessions. Additional AI capabilities include automated bookmarking, summarization, and pattern detection across multiple studies. Positioned as a lean, practical tool for researchers who want to move quickly, Condens aims to streamline the path from interview transcripts to shareable insights without the overhead of heavier enterprise systems. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Gladia is a speech-to-text API built for developers and product teams who want to embed transcription and audio intelligence into their own applications, including meeting assistants and note-taking tools. It offers both asynchronous transcription of pre-recorded audio and video files and a real-time streaming engine over WebSocket that returns results with low latency, making it suitable for live meetings and calls. The platform handles a wide range of languages with automatic language detection and code-switching, so it can follow conversations where participants switch languages mid-call. For meeting use cases, Gladia provides speaker diarization to label who said what, word-level timestamps, custom vocabulary, and audio-intelligence features such as summarization, sentiment analysis, and action-item extraction. It also offers meeting-bot integration that can join Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams sessions to capture audio. Gladia positions itself as infrastructure rather than an end-user product, so companies typically use it to power their own transcription, captioning, or conversation-analytics features while relying on Gladia's compliance posture for data handling. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Condens is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Gladia is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Condens | Gladia |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automated multilingual transcription with speaker recognition and captions | Real-time streaming transcription over WebSocket with low latency |
| Standout feature | Split-screen interface for simultaneous data review and tagging | Asynchronous transcription for pre-recorded audio and video files |
| Team usage | AI-driven pattern identification across datasets | Speaker diarization with word-level timestamps |
| Integrations | Searchable centralized repository with cross-project discovery | Multilingual transcription with automatic language detection and code-switching |
| Languages & capture | Real-time collaborative analysis and tagging | Audio intelligence: summaries, sentiment analysis, and action-item extraction |
| Best-fit workflow | Integrations with Slack, Teams, Figma, and Miro plus whiteboards | Meeting-bot integration for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams |
Condens
Choose Condens if you need transcribing and tagging user interview recordings — strengths include fast, practical workflow from transcript to tagged insights.
Gladia
Choose Gladia if you need powering a custom ai meeting assistant or note-taker — strengths include single api covers both batch and real-time transcription use cases.
Condens
Gladia
It depends on your workflow. Condens is strong for transcribing and tagging user interview recordings, while Gladia is strong for powering a custom ai meeting assistant or note-taker. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Condens is a free tier with paid upgrades and Gladia is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Sure. Running both makes sense when their strengths don't overlap and the budget allows.
More head-to-head comparisons involving Condens and Gladia.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Conveo: AI-led qualitative research platform that runs video, voice, and text interviews and analyzes every signal for insights at speed. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Convin: AI conversation intelligence platform for contact centers and sales teams that records, transcribes, and scores calls, chats, and emails. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Convo: Bot-free real-time AI meeting assistant for Mac and Windows that transcribes calls, suggests replies live, and syncs notes to Slack, Notion, and HubSpot. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. CraftNote: A cross-platform AI meeting assistant that transcribes and summarizes conversations, identifies speakers, and can join calls on major meeting platforms. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Cresta: Enterprise contact-center AI platform combining real-time agent assist, autonomous AI agents, and conversation intelligence. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Cuebo: AI sales coaching platform with a roleplay arena of video-avatar buyers, automated course generation, and call analysis. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Daglo: Korean all-in-one AI notetaker by Action Power that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and lectures, with strong Korean recognition and post-recording tools. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Deepting: Real-time AI transcription and meeting summary app for meetings, interviews, and lectures across mobile and web. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Demodesk: AI sales meeting platform that records, transcribes, coaches reps, and automates note-taking, follow-ups, and CRM updates. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Condens: UX research platform for storing, transcribing, tagging, and analyzing user interviews in a searchable, collaborative repository. Deposely: AI deposition platform for litigators covering prep, real-time insights, and transcript review and summaries. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.