Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. TeamRetro: Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist Aurelius when organizing and tagging interview transcripts and notes matters most, and TeamRetro when conducting recurring team health checks to track morale and agile maturity matters most. Test each on your own meetings; the right choice tends to become obvious quickly.
Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time.
Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries.
Aurelius is a research repository and insights platform designed for UX researchers, designers, and product teams to manage qualitative research data end to end. It sits between a note-taking tool and a full research repository: teams bring in raw data such as interview notes and transcripts, organize and tag it, and the tool surfaces patterns and helps create reusable insights over time. Core capabilities include centralized storage for research data, note organization, data tagging, theme and pattern identification, and report generation, so findings can be referenced long after a study concludes. Aurelius is built with larger research organizations in mind, supporting consistent taxonomy across projects and keeping insights discoverable as repositories grow, while also enabling multi-team collaboration and research history and archival features. Researchers describe it as a low-effort way to tag and create insights they can reference in later product discussions. The platform positions itself as an alternative to fragmented approaches that rely on spreadsheets, Confluence, or Airtable for storing research. By centralizing qualitative data and making it searchable and well-organized, Aurelius aims to ensure that interview insights remain accessible and actionable across an organization. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
TeamRetro is a web-based platform designed specifically for agile teams to run structured retrospective meetings, team health checks, and estimation (planning poker) sessions. Rather than adapting a generic whiteboard, it provides a guided retrospective workflow with anonymous idea submission, dot voting, grouping, and action-item tracking carried forward between sessions. The tool ships with a large library of retrospective templates (such as Start/Stop/Continue, Sailboat, and 4Ls) and icebreakers, and includes recurring team health-check assessments that visualize how a team's agile maturity and sentiment trend over time. Its AI capabilities focus on the retro itself: automatically grouping similar cards into themes, generating discussion summaries when enabled, and producing icebreaker or custom health-check content from prompts, with organizations able to switch AI features on or off. TeamRetro integrates with tools like Jira, Trello, Microsoft Teams, and Slack so action items flow into existing workflows. It is delivered as a hosted SaaS product with a free trial and is used by teams ranging from startups to large enterprises looking to standardize and improve project retrospectives. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Aurelius is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Aurelius | TeamRetro |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Centralized repository for interview notes and transcripts | Action-item tracking carried across sessions |
| Standout feature | Data tagging and note organization | Guided retrospective workflow with anonymous input, grouping, and dot voting |
| Team usage | Theme and pattern identification across research | AI-assisted automatic grouping of similar ideas into themes |
| Integrations | Insight creation and report generation | AI-generated retrospective summaries (when enabled by the organization) |
| Languages & capture | Consistent taxonomy across projects for large repositories | Recurring team health checks with trend and sentiment tracking over time |
| Best-fit workflow | Multi-team collaboration with research history and archival | Large library of retrospective templates and icebreaker activities |
Aurelius
Choose Aurelius if you need organizing and tagging interview transcripts and notes — strengths include keeps interview insights discoverable and reusable over time.
TeamRetro
Choose TeamRetro if you need running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams — strengths include purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard.
Aurelius
TeamRetro
It depends on your workflow. Aurelius is strong for organizing and tagging interview transcripts and notes, while TeamRetro is strong for running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Aurelius is a free tier with paid upgrades and TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Sure. Running both makes sense when their strengths don't overlap and the budget allows.
More head-to-head comparisons involving Aurelius and TeamRetro.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Auris AI: Southeast Asia–built AI platform for transcribing audio and video, generating subtitles, and producing meeting and lecture notes across regional languages. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. AutoMemo: Japanese transcription AI from Sourcenext that records meetings via web app, smartphone app, or dedicated voice recorders, then transcribes, summarizes, and shares. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Ava: AI live captioning and transcription app for accessibility, providing real-time captions for conversations and video meetings. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Aviso AI: End-to-end AI revenue platform whose conversation intelligence records and analyzes sales calls and meetings for B2B revenue teams. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. BB Recorder: A 100% local, no-bot meeting recorder for Mac and iOS that records, transcribes, and summarizes entirely on-device, built by the BuildBetter team. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Backtrack: An AI meeting intelligence tool for trade shows and hosted buyer events that captures 1:1 conversations and turns them into CRM-ready notes and insights. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Balto: Real-time AI guidance and agent-assist platform that coaches contact-center and sales agents live during calls. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. BarRaiser: AI interview intelligence platform that records interviews and coaches interviewers for better hiring. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Basil AI: On-device AI note taker for Apple devices that transcribes and summarizes meetings entirely offline, with no cloud upload. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. BeAware Conference Captioning: AI real-time captioning and translation app for live in-person and hybrid events, with on-screen overlays and multilingual attendee access. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Bee: Wearable AI device that captures spoken conversations and turns them into transcripts, summaries, and reminders. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Beey: Web app for automatic transcription, subtitle creation, translation, and live transcription. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.