Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist Aurelius when organizing and tagging interview transcripts and notes matters most, and Tana when turning meeting notes into linked tasks and project knowledge matters most. Trial each on a few real meetings before you commit — the better fit usually shows fast.
Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Aurelius is a research repository and insights platform designed for UX researchers, designers, and product teams to manage qualitative research data end to end. It sits between a note-taking tool and a full research repository: teams bring in raw data such as interview notes and transcripts, organize and tag it, and the tool surfaces patterns and helps create reusable insights over time. Core capabilities include centralized storage for research data, note organization, data tagging, theme and pattern identification, and report generation, so findings can be referenced long after a study concludes. Aurelius is built with larger research organizations in mind, supporting consistent taxonomy across projects and keeping insights discoverable as repositories grow, while also enabling multi-team collaboration and research history and archival features. Researchers describe it as a low-effort way to tag and create insights they can reference in later product discussions. The platform positions itself as an alternative to fragmented approaches that rely on spreadsheets, Confluence, or Airtable for storing research. By centralizing qualitative data and making it searchable and well-organized, Aurelius aims to ensure that interview insights remain accessible and actionable across an organization. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Tana is an AI-native workspace that combines outlining, knowledge management, and a built-in meeting notetaker. Its Meeting Notetaker captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings without requiring a bot to join the call; instead, it records computer system audio directly from the desktop app, which means it works across Zoom, Google Meet, Teams, and even in-person meetings, lectures, and interviews started on the computer. On Mac, Tana can detect when a meeting link is opened and offer to start transcribing immediately. Once captured, transcripts and summaries flow directly into the Tana workspace, where the AI can extract action items and push them to task boards, link the meeting to relevant people and projects, and surface notes where they are needed. It supports many languages with automatic detection and is available on Mac and Windows desktop apps. Tana is aimed at professionals and teams who want their meeting notes to become structured, connected knowledge rather than isolated transcripts, integrating capture with an ongoing personal or team knowledge system. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Aurelius is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Aurelius | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Centralized repository for interview notes and transcripts | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | Data tagging and note organization | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Theme and pattern identification across research | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | Insight creation and report generation | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | Consistent taxonomy across projects for large repositories | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | Multi-team collaboration with research history and archival | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
Aurelius
Choose Aurelius if you need organizing and tagging interview transcripts and notes — strengths include keeps interview insights discoverable and reusable over time.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Aurelius
Tana
It depends on your workflow. Aurelius is strong for organizing and tagging interview transcripts and notes, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Aurelius is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary.
More head-to-head comparisons involving Aurelius and Tana.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Auris AI: Southeast Asia–built AI platform for transcribing audio and video, generating subtitles, and producing meeting and lecture notes across regional languages. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. AutoMemo: Japanese transcription AI from Sourcenext that records meetings via web app, smartphone app, or dedicated voice recorders, then transcribes, summarizes, and shares. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Ava: AI live captioning and transcription app for accessibility, providing real-time captions for conversations and video meetings. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Aviso AI: End-to-end AI revenue platform whose conversation intelligence records and analyzes sales calls and meetings for B2B revenue teams. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. BB Recorder: A 100% local, no-bot meeting recorder for Mac and iOS that records, transcribes, and summarizes entirely on-device, built by the BuildBetter team. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Backtrack: An AI meeting intelligence tool for trade shows and hosted buyer events that captures 1:1 conversations and turns them into CRM-ready notes and insights. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Balto: Real-time AI guidance and agent-assist platform that coaches contact-center and sales agents live during calls. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. BarRaiser: AI interview intelligence platform that records interviews and coaches interviewers for better hiring. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Basil AI: On-device AI note taker for Apple devices that transcribes and summarizes meetings entirely offline, with no cloud upload. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. BeAware Conference Captioning: AI real-time captioning and translation app for live in-person and hybrid events, with on-screen overlays and multilingual attendee access. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Bee: Wearable AI device that captures spoken conversations and turns them into transcripts, summaries, and reminders. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Beey: Web app for automatic transcription, subtitle creation, translation, and live transcription. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.