Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. CaseMark: CaseMark is an AI legal operating system whose court-reporting product processes uploaded deposition and proceeding recordings into reviewed transcripts and structured summaries for law firms and court reporters. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist Aurelius when organizing and tagging interview transcripts and notes matters most, and CaseMark when litigation teams turning hearing and deposition recordings into structured summaries and chronologies matters most. Test each on your own meetings; the right choice tends to become obvious quickly.
Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time.
CaseMark is an AI legal operating system whose court-reporting product processes uploaded deposition and proceeding recordings into reviewed transcripts and structured summaries for law firms and court reporters.
Aurelius is a research repository and insights platform designed for UX researchers, designers, and product teams to manage qualitative research data end to end. It sits between a note-taking tool and a full research repository: teams bring in raw data such as interview notes and transcripts, organize and tag it, and the tool surfaces patterns and helps create reusable insights over time. Core capabilities include centralized storage for research data, note organization, data tagging, theme and pattern identification, and report generation, so findings can be referenced long after a study concludes. Aurelius is built with larger research organizations in mind, supporting consistent taxonomy across projects and keeping insights discoverable as repositories grow, while also enabling multi-team collaboration and research history and archival features. Researchers describe it as a low-effort way to tag and create insights they can reference in later product discussions. The platform positions itself as an alternative to fragmented approaches that rely on spreadsheets, Confluence, or Airtable for storing research. By centralizing qualitative data and making it searchable and well-organized, Aurelius aims to ensure that interview insights remain accessible and actionable across an organization. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
CaseMark is an AI-powered legal operating system built for attorneys, law firms, and court-reporting providers. Within its court-reporting product, users upload audio or video recordings of depositions, hearings, and proceedings (up to 8GB per file), then review AI transcript drafts alongside the source media, verify terminology, and certify final transcripts. The platform does not record live proceedings or employ stenographers; it works from existing media files attached to a matter. Beyond transcription review, CaseMark generates structured work product from transcripts and documents, including deposition summaries (page-line, narrative, and analysis formats), proceeding recaps, indices, case summaries, and medical chronologies. Everything is organized around individual matters, with a branded client portal for secure delivery and matter-scoped chat. CaseMark is web-based (app.casemark.com) and exposes services through its case.dev API platform. It is SOC 2 Type II certified and HIPAA compliant, and states it does not use customer data for training. It targets court reporters, litigation teams, and corporate legal departments.
Best suited for
Aurelius is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); CaseMark is custom pricing (contact sales). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Aurelius | CaseMark |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Centralized repository for interview notes and transcripts | Uploads of deposition/proceeding audio and video (up to 8GB) for transcription review |
| Standout feature | Data tagging and note organization | AI transcript drafts reviewed alongside source media with terminology verification and certification |
| Team usage | Theme and pattern identification across research | Structured summaries: deposition (page-line, narrative, analysis), proceeding recaps, indices, and medical chronologies |
| Integrations | Insight creation and report generation | Matter-centric organization consolidating intake, sources, transcripts, and deliverables |
| Languages & capture | Consistent taxonomy across projects for large repositories | Branded client portal with secure delivery and matter-scoped chat |
| Best-fit workflow | Multi-team collaboration with research history and archival | case.dev API platform and web app (app.casemark.com) |
Aurelius
Choose Aurelius if you need organizing and tagging interview transcripts and notes — strengths include keeps interview insights discoverable and reusable over time.
CaseMark
Choose CaseMark if you need court reporters certifying transcripts and producing deposition summaries from recorded proceedings — strengths include purpose-built for legal proceedings and depositions, not generic notes.
Aurelius
CaseMark
It depends on your workflow. Aurelius is strong for organizing and tagging interview transcripts and notes, while CaseMark is strong for court reporters certifying transcripts and producing deposition summaries from recorded proceedings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Aurelius is a free tier with paid upgrades and CaseMark is custom pricing. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Sure. Running both makes sense when their strengths don't overlap and the budget allows.
More head-to-head comparisons involving Aurelius and CaseMark.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Auris AI: Southeast Asia–built AI platform for transcribing audio and video, generating subtitles, and producing meeting and lecture notes across regional languages. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. AutoMemo: Japanese transcription AI from Sourcenext that records meetings via web app, smartphone app, or dedicated voice recorders, then transcribes, summarizes, and shares. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Ava: AI live captioning and transcription app for accessibility, providing real-time captions for conversations and video meetings. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Aviso AI: End-to-end AI revenue platform whose conversation intelligence records and analyzes sales calls and meetings for B2B revenue teams. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. BB Recorder: A 100% local, no-bot meeting recorder for Mac and iOS that records, transcribes, and summarizes entirely on-device, built by the BuildBetter team. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Backtrack: An AI meeting intelligence tool for trade shows and hosted buyer events that captures 1:1 conversations and turns them into CRM-ready notes and insights. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Balto: Real-time AI guidance and agent-assist platform that coaches contact-center and sales agents live during calls. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. BarRaiser: AI interview intelligence platform that records interviews and coaches interviewers for better hiring. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Basil AI: On-device AI note taker for Apple devices that transcribes and summarizes meetings entirely offline, with no cloud upload. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. BeAware Conference Captioning: AI real-time captioning and translation app for live in-person and hybrid events, with on-screen overlays and multilingual attendee access. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Bee: Wearable AI device that captures spoken conversations and turns them into transcripts, summaries, and reminders. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. Beey: Web app for automatic transcription, subtitle creation, translation, and live transcription. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.