How do Agent MIA and Wudpecker compare on price?

Agent MIA is a free tier with paid upgrades and Wudpecker is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.

Can I use both Agent MIA and Wudpecker?

Sure. Running both makes sense when their strengths don't overlap and the budget allows.

Home/Agent MIA vs Wudpecker

Agent MIA vs Wudpecker

Q: Is Agent MIA or Wudpecker better for AI meeting notes?

It depends on your workflow. Agent MIA is strong for capturing in-person client or team meetings on a phone and getting an auto-emailed summary with decisions and action items, while Wudpecker is strong for sales discovery call notes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.

Agent MIA: A France-hosted AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, identifies speakers, and writes structured meeting reports you can question with cited answers. Wudpecker: AI notes with templates for sales, CS and product calls Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.

How Hosiqo compares and tests tools

Final recommendation

Shortlist Agent MIA when capturing in-person client or team meetings on a phone and getting an auto-emailed summary with decisions and action items matters most, and Wudpecker when standardized meeting summaries matters most. Try them side by side on real calls before deciding — needs vary by team.

Agent MIA

CustomAI Meeting Assistants

A France-hosted AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, identifies speakers, and writes structured meeting reports you can question with cited answers.

AI chat that answers questions about a single meeting or a whole project folder with transcript citationsExports to PDF, Word, SRT, and JSON plus industry-specific report templates and full-text searchFrance-only data hosting with configurable retention, encryption, right to erasure, and an optional HDS healthcare-grade hosting add-on

Details Visit

Wudpecker

About Agent MIA

Agent MIA is an AI meeting assistant published by the French company Alomia · IngéniSolution. It captures conversations several ways: through a phone's microphone for in-person meetings, by importing an existing audio file, or via a bot that automatically joins Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet calls. It then transcribes the audio using Mistral's Voxtral multilingual model and separates and identifies speakers with pyannote.ai diarization, including voice-fingerprint recognition of recurring participants. From each meeting it generates a structured report covering a summary, decisions, and action items with owners, deadlines, and priorities, and can email that report to participants automatically. An AI chat lets users ask questions about a meeting or an entire project folder, answering with citations back to the transcript. It offers industry report templates, full-text search, and exports to PDF, Word, SRT, and JSON. A core selling point is data sovereignty: audio and data are stored and processed only in France, with configurable retention, encryption, a right to erasure, and an optional healthcare-grade (HDS) hosting tier. It targets individual professionals through enterprise teams.

Best suited for

Capturing in-person client or team meetings on a phone and getting an auto-emailed summary with decisions and action items
Having a bot join Zoom, Teams, or Meet calls to transcribe, identify speakers, and produce a structured report
Querying past meetings or an entire project's recordings via AI chat to retrieve decisions and quotes with citations

About Wudpecker

Wudpecker is an AI meeting notetaker that records and transcribes calls and then generates structured, template-based summaries so each meeting produces consistent, ready-to-use notes. It works across major conferencing platforms and focuses on turning conversations into organized write-ups — decisions, next steps, and key points — rather than leaving users with a raw transcript. Templates let teams standardize how different meeting types are documented, which is useful for sales discovery calls, customer conversations, and recurring internal meetings. Wudpecker can share summaries and push notes into other tools so follow-ups happen where teams already work, and it supports multiple languages for international users. It is typically adopted by customer-facing and sales teams that value clean, repeatable summaries and want to reduce the manual effort of writing up calls, positioning itself as a lightweight, template-driven notetaker rather than a heavy analytics platform. Platforms: Zoom / Google Meet / Microsoft Teams. Integrations: Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, HubSpot. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.

Best suited for

Sales discovery call notes
Standardized meeting summaries
Multi-language documentation

Feature	Agent MIA	Wudpecker
Core capability	Multiple capture methods: phone microphone, audio file import, and a bot that auto-joins Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet	Recording and transcription
Standout feature	Multilingual AI transcription via Mistral Voxtral with automatic speaker separation and identification via pyannote.ai diarization	Template-based AI summaries
Team usage	Structured meeting reports with summary, decisions, and action items (owner, deadline, priority), auto-emailed to participants	Action items and key points
Integrations	AI chat that answers questions about a single meeting or a whole project folder with transcript citations	Sharing and integrations
Languages & capture	Exports to PDF, Word, SRT, and JSON plus industry-specific report templates and full-text search	Multi-language support
Best-fit workflow	France-only data hosting with configurable retention, encryption, right to erasure, and an optional HDS healthcare-grade hosting add-on	Recording and transcription

Agent MIA vs Wudpecker

About Agent MIA

About Wudpecker

Pricing comparison

Feature table

Best for

Pros & cons

FAQ

Is Agent MIA or Wudpecker better for AI meeting notes?

How do Agent MIA and Wudpecker compare on price?

Can I use both Agent MIA and Wudpecker?

Related comparisons