Is Equal Time or Wudpecker better for AI meeting notes?

It depends on your workflow. Equal Time is strong for improving meeting inclusion, while Wudpecker is strong for sales discovery call notes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.

How do Equal Time and Wudpecker compare on price?

Equal Time is a free tier with paid upgrades and Wudpecker is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.

Can I use both Equal Time and Wudpecker?

Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary.

Equal Time vs Wudpecker

Equal Time vs Wudpecker | Hosiqo

About Equal Time

Equal Time is an AI meeting assistant that combines standard transcription and notes with a distinctive focus on participation and inclusion analytics. It records and transcribes meetings, generates summaries and action items, and additionally tracks talk-time and speaking balance so teams can see how participation is distributed across a call. This inclusion-oriented angle makes it useful for managers and facilitators who want more equitable meetings, in addition to the usual benefits of automatic notes. Equal Time works across common video platforms, makes notes searchable, and can share recaps with attendees. It also offers prompts and metrics intended to encourage balanced participation during meetings. Equal Time is typically adopted by teams and organizations that care about meeting culture and inclusion alongside documentation, and it differentiates itself from general notetakers by reporting on how people participate, not just what was said, which appeals to leaders trying to improve how their meetings run. Platforms: Zoom / Google Meet / Microsoft Teams. Integrations: Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.

Best suited for

Improving meeting inclusion
Tracking speaking balance
Standard meeting notes and recaps

About Wudpecker

Wudpecker is an AI meeting notetaker that records and transcribes calls and then generates structured, template-based summaries so each meeting produces consistent, ready-to-use notes. It works across major conferencing platforms and focuses on turning conversations into organized write-ups — decisions, next steps, and key points — rather than leaving users with a raw transcript. Templates let teams standardize how different meeting types are documented, which is useful for sales discovery calls, customer conversations, and recurring internal meetings. Wudpecker can share summaries and push notes into other tools so follow-ups happen where teams already work, and it supports multiple languages for international users. It is typically adopted by customer-facing and sales teams that value clean, repeatable summaries and want to reduce the manual effort of writing up calls, positioning itself as a lightweight, template-driven notetaker rather than a heavy analytics platform. Platforms: Zoom / Google Meet / Microsoft Teams. Integrations: Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, HubSpot. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.

Best suited for

Sales discovery call notes
Standardized meeting summaries
Multi-language documentation

Feature table

Feature	Equal Time	Wudpecker
Core capability	Recording and transcription	Recording and transcription
Standout feature	AI summaries and action items	Template-based AI summaries
Team usage	Talk-time and participation analytics	Action items and key points
Integrations	Inclusion prompts and metrics	Sharing and integrations
Languages & capture	Searchable notes	Multi-language support

Related comparisons

More head-to-head comparisons involving Equal Time and Wudpecker.

Equal Time vs EventCAT

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics EventCAT: AI platform that delivers real-time subtitles and voice interpretation in 50+ languages for conferences, webinars, and online meetings. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.

Equal Time vs Evernote AI Meeting Notes

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Evernote AI Meeting Notes: Evernote's built-in feature that records meeting audio, transcribes it with speaker recognition, and summarizes it inside your notes. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.

Equal Time vs Exec

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Exec: Voice-based AI roleplay platform that lets sales reps practice high-stakes conversations against realistic AI buyers and get instant coaching. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.

Equal Time vs Exemplary AI

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Exemplary AI: AI transcription and content-repurposing tool that turns podcasts, webinars, interviews, and videos into transcripts, subtitles, clips, and written summaries. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.

Equal Time vs Fast Rekap

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Fast Rekap: iOS meeting recorder that transcribes conversations and turns them into structured summaries, presentation slides, and mind maps with chat-with-transcript Q&A. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.

Equal Time vs Feishu Minutes

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Feishu Minutes: ByteDance's Feishu/Lark feature that transcribes audio and video into searchable minutes with AI summaries and to-dos. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.

Equal Time vs Fieldy

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Fieldy: Wearable AI note taker that records in-person conversations and meetings, then transcribes and summarizes them automatically. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.

Equal Time vs FinMate AI

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics FinMate AI: AI notetaker built by advisors for advisors that records client meetings and structures notes by meeting type. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.

Equal Time vs FinScribe

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics FinScribe: AI meeting note taker for wealth and financial advisors that produces compliance-ready notes, prep pages, and follow-up emails. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.

Equal Time vs FlashRev

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics FlashRev: AI parallel dialer within the FlashLabs go-to-market platform, with call recording, real-time conversation analysis, and AI summaries. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.

Equal Time vs FullyRamped

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics FullyRamped: AI sales roleplay, coaching, and call-grading platform that practices reps across the full sales cycle and grades real calls. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.

Equal Time vs GReminders

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics GReminders: End-to-end meeting management platform for client-facing professionals, pairing scheduling and reminders with an AI notetaker. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.