Is Equal Time or Maestra better for AI meeting notes?

It depends on your workflow. Equal Time is strong for improving meeting inclusion, while Maestra is strong for generating multilingual subtitles for video content. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.

How do Equal Time and Maestra compare on price?

Equal Time is a free tier with paid upgrades and Maestra is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.

Can I use both Equal Time and Maestra?

You can — some teams pair them when each covers a different part of the meeting workflow.

Equal Time vs Maestra

Equal Time vs Maestra | Hosiqo

About Equal Time

Equal Time is an AI meeting assistant that combines standard transcription and notes with a distinctive focus on participation and inclusion analytics. It records and transcribes meetings, generates summaries and action items, and additionally tracks talk-time and speaking balance so teams can see how participation is distributed across a call. This inclusion-oriented angle makes it useful for managers and facilitators who want more equitable meetings, in addition to the usual benefits of automatic notes. Equal Time works across common video platforms, makes notes searchable, and can share recaps with attendees. It also offers prompts and metrics intended to encourage balanced participation during meetings. Equal Time is typically adopted by teams and organizations that care about meeting culture and inclusion alongside documentation, and it differentiates itself from general notetakers by reporting on how people participate, not just what was said, which appeals to leaders trying to improve how their meetings run. Platforms: Zoom / Google Meet / Microsoft Teams. Integrations: Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.

Best suited for

Improving meeting inclusion
Tracking speaking balance
Standard meeting notes and recaps

About Maestra

Maestra is an AI-powered media platform that provides transcription, subtitling, translation, and dubbing for audio and video content, both on demand and in real time. For transcription, users upload audio or video and Maestra produces speech-to-text output with features such as speaker detection, punctuation, and timestamps. The platform can auto-generate subtitles and captions, which users can edit, style, and export in multiple formats, and it can translate that text across a large set of languages. Maestra also offers live transcription for meetings, webinars, and streams, with stated integrations for platforms including Zoom and Microsoft Teams, as well as live production tools. This makes it usable both as a post-production transcription and captioning service and as a real-time captioning layer over live sessions. Maestra is aimed at media companies, content creators, marketers, and organizations that need multilingual transcripts, subtitles, and captions, and that may also want real-time captioning for live events and meetings. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.

Best suited for

Generating multilingual subtitles for video content
Adding live captions to webinars, streams, and meetings
Producing transcripts with speaker labels and timestamps

Feature table

Feature	Equal Time	Maestra
Core capability	Recording and transcription	AI transcription with speaker detection, punctuation, and timestamps
Standout feature	AI summaries and action items	Automatic subtitle and caption generation with editing tools
Team usage	Talk-time and participation analytics	Translation of transcripts and subtitles across many languages
Integrations	Inclusion prompts and metrics	Real-time live transcription for meetings, webinars, and streams
Languages & capture	Searchable notes	Integrations with live and meeting platforms such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams

Related comparisons

More head-to-head comparisons involving Equal Time and Maestra.

Equal Time vs EventCAT

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics EventCAT: AI platform that delivers real-time subtitles and voice interpretation in 50+ languages for conferences, webinars, and online meetings. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.

Equal Time vs Evernote AI Meeting Notes

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Evernote AI Meeting Notes: Evernote's built-in feature that records meeting audio, transcribes it with speaker recognition, and summarizes it inside your notes. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.

Equal Time vs Exec

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Exec: Voice-based AI roleplay platform that lets sales reps practice high-stakes conversations against realistic AI buyers and get instant coaching. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.

Equal Time vs Exemplary AI

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Exemplary AI: AI transcription and content-repurposing tool that turns podcasts, webinars, interviews, and videos into transcripts, subtitles, clips, and written summaries. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.

Equal Time vs Fast Rekap

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Fast Rekap: iOS meeting recorder that transcribes conversations and turns them into structured summaries, presentation slides, and mind maps with chat-with-transcript Q&A. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.

Equal Time vs Feishu Minutes

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Feishu Minutes: ByteDance's Feishu/Lark feature that transcribes audio and video into searchable minutes with AI summaries and to-dos. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.

Equal Time vs Fieldy

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Fieldy: Wearable AI note taker that records in-person conversations and meetings, then transcribes and summarizes them automatically. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.

Equal Time vs FinMate AI

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics FinMate AI: AI notetaker built by advisors for advisors that records client meetings and structures notes by meeting type. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.

Equal Time vs FinScribe

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics FinScribe: AI meeting note taker for wealth and financial advisors that produces compliance-ready notes, prep pages, and follow-up emails. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.

Equal Time vs FlashRev

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics FlashRev: AI parallel dialer within the FlashLabs go-to-market platform, with call recording, real-time conversation analysis, and AI summaries. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.

Equal Time vs FullyRamped

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics FullyRamped: AI sales roleplay, coaching, and call-grading platform that practices reps across the full sales cycle and grades real calls. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.

Equal Time vs GReminders

Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics GReminders: End-to-end meeting management platform for client-facing professionals, pairing scheduling and reminders with an AI notetaker. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.