Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Mina: An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist Echometer when running recurring agile retrospectives with consistent, structured templates matters most, and Mina when running standups and filing tickets as an ai scrum facilitator matters most. Run both through a week of actual calls to see which suits your workflow.
Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions.
An AI meeting assistant that joins calls as a participant and can respond, take actions, and update connected tools live during the conversation.
Echometer is a German-built platform purpose-made for running team retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured one-on-one (1:1) meetings. Aimed at engineering managers, scrum masters, and agile coaches, it pairs interactive retrospective boards with research-grounded survey questions so teams get guided, psychology-based reflection rather than a blank whiteboard. The retrospective tool offers a wide range of templates (such as Sailboat, Keep-Stop-Start, and others), supports both synchronous and asynchronous retros, and lets teams group, prioritize, and track measures coming out of each session. Health-check pulses run on a recurring basis to gather anonymous feedback and visualize how a team's agile maturity and satisfaction develop over time. A separate 1:1 meeting module provides templates and structured formats for manager-employee conversations. Echometer includes smart, AI-supported recommendations that surface food for thought and help brainstorm action items during retrospectives and 1:1s. The product is hosted in an ISO 27001-certified data center in Germany, offers a free tier, and is used by both small teams and large enterprises that want a consistent, data-informed approach to continuous team improvement. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Mina is an AI meeting assistant designed to actively participate in calls rather than only record them. It joins meetings as a participant on Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams, listens to the conversation, and can operate in a reactive mode that responds only when invoked with a wake phrase, or a proactive mode that listens continuously and takes actions on its own. During a meeting, Mina can capture decisions and action items, retrieve context from connected tools in real time, and generate outputs such as summaries, proposals, and follow-ups while the conversation is still in progress. It maintains memory across meetings and can be configured for different roles, such as a moderator, scrum facilitator, or interviewer. Mina connects with a broad set of business tools, including Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub, allowing it to update CRMs, file tickets, and push follow-ups as part of its workflow. It is aimed at sales teams that need live discovery support and instant CRM updates, customer success teams handling renewals and reviews, project teams running standups, and hiring managers, with the goal of reducing manual post-meeting work. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Echometer is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Echometer | Mina |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Interactive, psychology-based retrospective boards with grouping and prioritization | Joins Google Meet, Zoom, and Teams as an active participant |
| Standout feature | Recurring team health-check pulses with longitudinal trend visualization | Reactive (wake-phrase) and proactive (always-on) operating modes |
| Team usage | Dedicated 1:1 meeting module with structured templates | Live generation of summaries, proposals, action items, and follow-ups |
| Integrations | AI-supported recommendations for retro and 1:1 discussion topics and action items | Real-time CRM and workflow updates to connected tools |
| Languages & capture | Synchronous and asynchronous retrospective support | Cross-meeting memory and configurable assistant roles |
| Best-fit workflow | Tracking of measures and action items across sessions | Integrations with Slack, HubSpot, Salesforce, Jira, Notion, Linear, and GitHub |
Echometer
Choose Echometer if you need running recurring agile retrospectives with consistent, structured templates — strengths include covers retrospectives, health checks, and 1:1s in a single purpose-built tool.
Mina
Choose Mina if you need providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls — strengths include acts during the meeting rather than only producing notes afterward.
Echometer
Mina
It depends on your workflow. Echometer is strong for running recurring agile retrospectives with consistent, structured templates, while Mina is strong for providing live discovery support and updating the crm during sales calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Echometer is a free tier with paid upgrades and Mina is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Sure. Running both makes sense when their strengths don't overlap and the budget allows.
More head-to-head comparisons involving Echometer and Mina.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Edisyn: Real-time AI meeting assistant from a Turkish-founded team that listens to calls and provides live notes, summaries, and suggested questions and answers. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Efficlose: An AI meeting platform offering a bot-free Chrome extension plus desktop and web apps that transcribe, summarize, and extract action items from calls. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. EventCAT: AI platform that delivers real-time subtitles and voice interpretation in 50+ languages for conferences, webinars, and online meetings. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Evernote AI Meeting Notes: Evernote's built-in feature that records meeting audio, transcribes it with speaker recognition, and summarizes it inside your notes. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Exec: Voice-based AI roleplay platform that lets sales reps practice high-stakes conversations against realistic AI buyers and get instant coaching. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Exemplary AI: AI transcription and content-repurposing tool that turns podcasts, webinars, interviews, and videos into transcripts, subtitles, clips, and written summaries. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Fast Rekap: iOS meeting recorder that transcribes conversations and turns them into structured summaries, presentation slides, and mind maps with chat-with-transcript Q&A. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Feishu Minutes: ByteDance's Feishu/Lark feature that transcribes audio and video into searchable minutes with AI summaries and to-dos. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Fieldy: Wearable AI note taker that records in-person conversations and meetings, then transcribes and summarizes them automatically. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. FinMate AI: AI notetaker built by advisors for advisors that records client meetings and structures notes by meeting type. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. FinScribe: AI meeting note taker for wealth and financial advisors that produces compliance-ready notes, prep pages, and follow-up emails. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.