Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Meetily: Open-source, privacy-first AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on your own device. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist Echometer when running recurring agile retrospectives with consistent, structured templates matters most, and Meetily when capturing and summarizing in-person or any-platform meetings from one app matters most. Run both through a week of actual calls to see which suits your workflow.
Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions.
Open-source, privacy-first AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on your own device.
Echometer is a German-built platform purpose-made for running team retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured one-on-one (1:1) meetings. Aimed at engineering managers, scrum masters, and agile coaches, it pairs interactive retrospective boards with research-grounded survey questions so teams get guided, psychology-based reflection rather than a blank whiteboard. The retrospective tool offers a wide range of templates (such as Sailboat, Keep-Stop-Start, and others), supports both synchronous and asynchronous retros, and lets teams group, prioritize, and track measures coming out of each session. Health-check pulses run on a recurring basis to gather anonymous feedback and visualize how a team's agile maturity and satisfaction develop over time. A separate 1:1 meeting module provides templates and structured formats for manager-employee conversations. Echometer includes smart, AI-supported recommendations that surface food for thought and help brainstorm action items during retrospectives and 1:1s. The product is hosted in an ISO 27001-certified data center in Germany, offers a free tier, and is used by both small teams and large enterprises that want a consistent, data-informed approach to continuous team improvement. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Meetily is an open-source, privacy-first AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes conversations locally on the user's own machine rather than in the cloud. Instead of joining calls as a visible bot participant, Meetily captures system audio directly from the device, the same way screen recording works, so no extra attendee shows up in the meeting and recordings stay on the host's computer. Because processing happens on-device, it works with effectively any meeting software, including Google Meet, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Discord, as well as in-person conversations. After a meeting, it generates AI summaries that surface key decisions and action items, supports customizable summary templates, and can export notes to Markdown. The project is MIT licensed with a free community edition alongside paid Pro and Enterprise tiers, and it is distributed for macOS and Windows. Meetily is aimed at privacy-conscious individuals, technical teams, and organizations that want a self-hostable, local-first alternative to bot-based notetakers and need to keep sensitive meeting audio off third-party servers. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Echometer is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Meetily is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Echometer | Meetily |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Interactive, psychology-based retrospective boards with grouping and prioritization | Local, on-device recording, transcription, and summarization |
| Standout feature | Recurring team health-check pulses with longitudinal trend visualization | Bot-free capture via system audio (no visible meeting participant) |
| Team usage | Dedicated 1:1 meeting module with structured templates | Works across Google Meet, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Discord, and in-person meetings |
| Integrations | AI-supported recommendations for retro and 1:1 discussion topics and action items | AI summaries highlighting key decisions and action items |
| Languages & capture | Synchronous and asynchronous retrospective support | Customizable summary templates and Markdown export |
| Best-fit workflow | Tracking of measures and action items across sessions | Open-source (MIT licensed) with self-hosting option |
Echometer
Choose Echometer if you need running recurring agile retrospectives with consistent, structured templates — strengths include covers retrospectives, health checks, and 1:1s in a single purpose-built tool.
Meetily
Choose Meetily if you need privacy-conscious teams that need meeting notes without sending audio to the cloud — strengths include strong privacy posture since audio and processing stay on the user's device.
Echometer
Meetily
It depends on your workflow. Echometer is strong for running recurring agile retrospectives with consistent, structured templates, while Meetily is strong for privacy-conscious teams that need meeting notes without sending audio to the cloud. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Echometer is a free tier with paid upgrades and Meetily is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Sure. Running both makes sense when their strengths don't overlap and the budget allows.
More head-to-head comparisons involving Echometer and Meetily.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Edisyn: Real-time AI meeting assistant from a Turkish-founded team that listens to calls and provides live notes, summaries, and suggested questions and answers. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Efficlose: An AI meeting platform offering a bot-free Chrome extension plus desktop and web apps that transcribe, summarize, and extract action items from calls. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. EventCAT: AI platform that delivers real-time subtitles and voice interpretation in 50+ languages for conferences, webinars, and online meetings. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Evernote AI Meeting Notes: Evernote's built-in feature that records meeting audio, transcribes it with speaker recognition, and summarizes it inside your notes. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Exec: Voice-based AI roleplay platform that lets sales reps practice high-stakes conversations against realistic AI buyers and get instant coaching. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Exemplary AI: AI transcription and content-repurposing tool that turns podcasts, webinars, interviews, and videos into transcripts, subtitles, clips, and written summaries. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Fast Rekap: iOS meeting recorder that transcribes conversations and turns them into structured summaries, presentation slides, and mind maps with chat-with-transcript Q&A. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Feishu Minutes: ByteDance's Feishu/Lark feature that transcribes audio and video into searchable minutes with AI summaries and to-dos. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Fieldy: Wearable AI note taker that records in-person conversations and meetings, then transcribes and summarizes them automatically. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. FinMate AI: AI notetaker built by advisors for advisors that records client meetings and structures notes by meeting type. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. FinScribe: AI meeting note taker for wealth and financial advisors that produces compliance-ready notes, prep pages, and follow-up emails. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.