Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Gling: Gling is an AI video editing tool that transcribes recordings and automatically removes silences, filler words, and bad takes so creators can edit by editing the transcript. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist Echometer when running recurring agile retrospectives with consistent, structured templates matters most, and Gling when cleaning up and transcribing podcast recordings before export to an audio file or nle matters most. Try them side by side on real calls before deciding — needs vary by team.
Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions.
Gling is an AI video editing tool that transcribes recordings and automatically removes silences, filler words, and bad takes so creators can edit by editing the transcript.
Echometer is a German-built platform purpose-made for running team retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured one-on-one (1:1) meetings. Aimed at engineering managers, scrum masters, and agile coaches, it pairs interactive retrospective boards with research-grounded survey questions so teams get guided, psychology-based reflection rather than a blank whiteboard. The retrospective tool offers a wide range of templates (such as Sailboat, Keep-Stop-Start, and others), supports both synchronous and asynchronous retros, and lets teams group, prioritize, and track measures coming out of each session. Health-check pulses run on a recurring basis to gather anonymous feedback and visualize how a team's agile maturity and satisfaction develop over time. A separate 1:1 meeting module provides templates and structured formats for manager-employee conversations. Echometer includes smart, AI-supported recommendations that surface food for thought and help brainstorm action items during retrospectives and 1:1s. The product is hosted in an ISO 27001-certified data center in Germany, offers a free tier, and is used by both small teams and large enterprises that want a consistent, data-informed approach to continuous team improvement. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Gling is an AI-powered video editing platform built mainly for YouTubers, podcasters, and educators who record talking-head and dialogue-heavy content. It works by first transcribing the uploaded recording into searchable text, then letting users edit by trimming the transcript rather than dragging clips on a timeline. From that transcript, Gling automatically detects and removes long silences, filler words like "um" and "uh," and repeated bad takes, keeping the best delivery of each line. It also generates captions and subtitles, suggests YouTube-optimized titles, and creates chapter markers. The transcription engine supports many languages, including English, Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, Arabic, Chinese, Korean, and Japanese, and transcripts can be exported as SRT subtitle files. Finished edits export to MP4 or MP3, or as project files (XML/EDL) for Final Cut Pro, Adobe Premiere, and DaVinci Resolve. Gling is positioned as a workflow accelerator that turns raw footage into a polished cut faster than manual editing, with transcription serving as the foundation for its automated cuts.
Best suited for
Echometer is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Gling is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Echometer | Gling |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Interactive, psychology-based retrospective boards with grouping and prioritization | AI speech-to-text transcription of uploaded video and audio, exportable as SRT subtitles |
| Standout feature | Recurring team health-check pulses with longitudinal trend visualization | Automatic removal of silences, filler words, and awkward pauses |
| Team usage | Dedicated 1:1 meeting module with structured templates | Bad-take detection that keeps the best of repeated lines |
| Integrations | AI-supported recommendations for retro and 1:1 discussion topics and action items | Text-based editing: cut footage by editing the transcript |
| Languages & capture | Synchronous and asynchronous retrospective support | Auto-generated captions, YouTube titles, and chapter markers |
| Best-fit workflow | Tracking of measures and action items across sessions | Export to MP4/MP3 or project files for Final Cut Pro, Premiere, and DaVinci Resolve |
Echometer
Choose Echometer if you need running recurring agile retrospectives with consistent, structured templates — strengths include covers retrospectives, health checks, and 1:1s in a single purpose-built tool.
Gling
Choose Gling if you need editing youtube talking-head videos by removing silences, filler words, and flubbed takes — strengths include transcript-driven editing makes cutting talking-head footage much faster than a manual timeline.
Echometer
Gling
It depends on your workflow. Echometer is strong for running recurring agile retrospectives with consistent, structured templates, while Gling is strong for editing youtube talking-head videos by removing silences, filler words, and flubbed takes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Echometer is a free tier with paid upgrades and Gling is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary.
More head-to-head comparisons involving Echometer and Gling.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Edisyn: Real-time AI meeting assistant from a Turkish-founded team that listens to calls and provides live notes, summaries, and suggested questions and answers. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Efficlose: An AI meeting platform offering a bot-free Chrome extension plus desktop and web apps that transcribe, summarize, and extract action items from calls. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. EventCAT: AI platform that delivers real-time subtitles and voice interpretation in 50+ languages for conferences, webinars, and online meetings. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Evernote AI Meeting Notes: Evernote's built-in feature that records meeting audio, transcribes it with speaker recognition, and summarizes it inside your notes. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Exec: Voice-based AI roleplay platform that lets sales reps practice high-stakes conversations against realistic AI buyers and get instant coaching. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Exemplary AI: AI transcription and content-repurposing tool that turns podcasts, webinars, interviews, and videos into transcripts, subtitles, clips, and written summaries. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Fast Rekap: iOS meeting recorder that transcribes conversations and turns them into structured summaries, presentation slides, and mind maps with chat-with-transcript Q&A. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Feishu Minutes: ByteDance's Feishu/Lark feature that transcribes audio and video into searchable minutes with AI summaries and to-dos. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Fieldy: Wearable AI note taker that records in-person conversations and meetings, then transcribes and summarizes them automatically. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. FinMate AI: AI notetaker built by advisors for advisors that records client meetings and structures notes by meeting type. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. FinScribe: AI meeting note taker for wealth and financial advisors that produces compliance-ready notes, prep pages, and follow-up emails. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.