Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Gladia: Developer-focused speech-to-text API with real-time and async transcription, diarization, and meeting-bot integrations. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist Echometer when running recurring agile retrospectives with consistent, structured templates matters most, and Gladia when adding live captions and transcripts to video-conferencing products matters most. Try them side by side on real calls before deciding — needs vary by team.
Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions.
Developer-focused speech-to-text API with real-time and async transcription, diarization, and meeting-bot integrations.
Echometer is a German-built platform purpose-made for running team retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured one-on-one (1:1) meetings. Aimed at engineering managers, scrum masters, and agile coaches, it pairs interactive retrospective boards with research-grounded survey questions so teams get guided, psychology-based reflection rather than a blank whiteboard. The retrospective tool offers a wide range of templates (such as Sailboat, Keep-Stop-Start, and others), supports both synchronous and asynchronous retros, and lets teams group, prioritize, and track measures coming out of each session. Health-check pulses run on a recurring basis to gather anonymous feedback and visualize how a team's agile maturity and satisfaction develop over time. A separate 1:1 meeting module provides templates and structured formats for manager-employee conversations. Echometer includes smart, AI-supported recommendations that surface food for thought and help brainstorm action items during retrospectives and 1:1s. The product is hosted in an ISO 27001-certified data center in Germany, offers a free tier, and is used by both small teams and large enterprises that want a consistent, data-informed approach to continuous team improvement. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Gladia is a speech-to-text API built for developers and product teams who want to embed transcription and audio intelligence into their own applications, including meeting assistants and note-taking tools. It offers both asynchronous transcription of pre-recorded audio and video files and a real-time streaming engine over WebSocket that returns results with low latency, making it suitable for live meetings and calls. The platform handles a wide range of languages with automatic language detection and code-switching, so it can follow conversations where participants switch languages mid-call. For meeting use cases, Gladia provides speaker diarization to label who said what, word-level timestamps, custom vocabulary, and audio-intelligence features such as summarization, sentiment analysis, and action-item extraction. It also offers meeting-bot integration that can join Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams sessions to capture audio. Gladia positions itself as infrastructure rather than an end-user product, so companies typically use it to power their own transcription, captioning, or conversation-analytics features while relying on Gladia's compliance posture for data handling. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Echometer is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Gladia is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Echometer | Gladia |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Interactive, psychology-based retrospective boards with grouping and prioritization | Real-time streaming transcription over WebSocket with low latency |
| Standout feature | Recurring team health-check pulses with longitudinal trend visualization | Asynchronous transcription for pre-recorded audio and video files |
| Team usage | Dedicated 1:1 meeting module with structured templates | Speaker diarization with word-level timestamps |
| Integrations | AI-supported recommendations for retro and 1:1 discussion topics and action items | Multilingual transcription with automatic language detection and code-switching |
| Languages & capture | Synchronous and asynchronous retrospective support | Audio intelligence: summaries, sentiment analysis, and action-item extraction |
| Best-fit workflow | Tracking of measures and action items across sessions | Meeting-bot integration for Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams |
Echometer
Choose Echometer if you need running recurring agile retrospectives with consistent, structured templates — strengths include covers retrospectives, health checks, and 1:1s in a single purpose-built tool.
Gladia
Choose Gladia if you need powering a custom ai meeting assistant or note-taker — strengths include single api covers both batch and real-time transcription use cases.
Echometer
Gladia
It depends on your workflow. Echometer is strong for running recurring agile retrospectives with consistent, structured templates, while Gladia is strong for powering a custom ai meeting assistant or note-taker. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Echometer is a free tier with paid upgrades and Gladia is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary.
More head-to-head comparisons involving Echometer and Gladia.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Edisyn: Real-time AI meeting assistant from a Turkish-founded team that listens to calls and provides live notes, summaries, and suggested questions and answers. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Efficlose: An AI meeting platform offering a bot-free Chrome extension plus desktop and web apps that transcribe, summarize, and extract action items from calls. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. EventCAT: AI platform that delivers real-time subtitles and voice interpretation in 50+ languages for conferences, webinars, and online meetings. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Evernote AI Meeting Notes: Evernote's built-in feature that records meeting audio, transcribes it with speaker recognition, and summarizes it inside your notes. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Exec: Voice-based AI roleplay platform that lets sales reps practice high-stakes conversations against realistic AI buyers and get instant coaching. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Exemplary AI: AI transcription and content-repurposing tool that turns podcasts, webinars, interviews, and videos into transcripts, subtitles, clips, and written summaries. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Fast Rekap: iOS meeting recorder that transcribes conversations and turns them into structured summaries, presentation slides, and mind maps with chat-with-transcript Q&A. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Feishu Minutes: ByteDance's Feishu/Lark feature that transcribes audio and video into searchable minutes with AI summaries and to-dos. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Fieldy: Wearable AI note taker that records in-person conversations and meetings, then transcribes and summarizes them automatically. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. FinMate AI: AI notetaker built by advisors for advisors that records client meetings and structures notes by meeting type. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. FinScribe: AI meeting note taker for wealth and financial advisors that produces compliance-ready notes, prep pages, and follow-up emails. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.