DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Minutes: Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist DepoDash when conducting remote depositions with real-time transcription and exhibit sharing matters most, and Minutes when recording and transcribing calls locally for users who refuse cloud meeting tools matters most. Trial each on a few real meetings before you commit — the better fit usually shows fast.
Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers.
Open-source, local-first conversation memory layer that records and transcribes meetings, diarizes speakers, and stores searchable notes as markdown for AI agents.
DepoDash is a cloud-based court-reporting and legal transcription platform that delivers on-demand verbatim records for depositions, hearings, and other legal proceedings in a secure environment. The platform mirrors traditional court-reporting workflows and can produce the record through a stenographic reporter, a mask (voice) writer, or AI-based automatic speech recognition, giving legal teams flexible options. For existing recordings, users can upload audio files from depositions, hearings, or interviews and the AI engine identifies speakers and generates formatted transcripts in minutes, which can then be edited and certified by a legal transcriber. DepoDash applies legal-specific formatting such as line numbering, Q&A formatting, and timestamps, and supports real-time transcription with live annotations, exhibit and file sharing, secure breakout rooms, and speaker identification. It emphasizes protecting the integrity of the digital record, restricting access to audio, video, exhibits, and transcripts so the record manager controls the material rather than a general conferencing service. With no software or hardware to install and pay-as-you-go or subscription options, DepoDash targets attorneys, court reporters, and litigation support teams who need accurate, certifiable transcripts that meet legal formatting and evidentiary expectations. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Minutes, built by Mat Silverstein, is an open-source, privacy-first conversation memory layer that captures meetings, calls, voice memos, and dictation and turns them into searchable, AI-accessible notes. It transcribes audio locally using whisper.cpp or Parakeet so audio never has to leave the machine, performs speaker diarization to separate voices, and extracts decisions and action items, writing everything to the user's own disk as plain markdown files with structured YAML frontmatter. Because the output lives in a local folder (for example ~/meetings/), the notes can sync across devices through iCloud, Dropbox, or Google Drive and can be read directly by AI tools. A central design goal is integration with AI assistants: Minutes runs an MCP server exposing a large set of tools so coding and chat agents such as Claude, Codex, Gemini CLI, and others can query past conversations, track relationships across meetings, and surface what was promised to whom. It ships as a macOS desktop app with a menu-bar recorder and AI assistant, plus a cross-platform command-line interface, and includes a dictation hotkey mode. The project is MIT licensed, installable via Homebrew, and actively maintained with frequent releases, making it a fully self-hostable option for people who want durable, private, searchable meeting memory rather than a cloud subscription. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
DepoDash is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | DepoDash | Minutes |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Cloud court reporting via stenographer, voice writer, or AI ASR | Local transcription with whisper.cpp or Parakeet, no cloud audio upload |
| Standout feature | AI transcription of uploaded deposition, hearing, and interview audio with speaker ID | Speaker diarization to attribute who said what |
| Team usage | Legal-specific formatting including line numbering, Q&A, and timestamps | Plain-markdown output with YAML frontmatter stored on your own disk |
| Integrations | Real-time transcription with live annotations during proceedings | MCP server exposing tools so AI agents can query meeting history |
| Languages & capture | Exhibit and file sharing plus secure breakout rooms | Cross-meeting search, relationship tracking, and action-item extraction |
| Best-fit workflow | Record-integrity controls limiting access to audio, video, and transcripts | macOS desktop app plus cross-platform CLI and dictation hotkey mode |
DepoDash
Choose DepoDash if you need conducting remote depositions with real-time transcription and exhibit sharing — strengths include flexible record production through ai, stenographers, or voice writers.
Minutes
Choose Minutes if you need building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query — strengths include fully local-first and mit licensed, keeping conversation data private and portable.
DepoDash
Minutes
It depends on your workflow. DepoDash is strong for conducting remote depositions with real-time transcription and exhibit sharing, while Minutes is strong for building a private, searchable memory of meetings and voice notes that ai agents can query. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
DepoDash is a free tier with paid upgrades and Minutes is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary.
More head-to-head comparisons involving DepoDash and Minutes.
DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Deposely: AI deposition platform for litigators covering prep, real-time insights, and transcript review and summaries. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.
DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Descript: Video/podcast editor with transcription and meeting recording This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Dialpad: AI-powered communications platform with a sales dialer that provides real-time transcription, live coaching cards, and post-call summaries. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Dicte: Privacy-focused AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and voice notes on mobile and desktop. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Dovetail: Customer insights platform that centralizes interviews and feedback, with AI transcription, analysis, search, and a research repository. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Dscout: Experience research platform for moderated interviews, diary studies, and usability testing with AI transcription, themes, and analysis. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Edisyn: Real-time AI meeting assistant from a Turkish-founded team that listens to calls and provides live notes, summaries, and suggested questions and answers. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Efficlose: An AI meeting platform offering a bot-free Chrome extension plus desktop and web apps that transcribe, summarize, and extract action items from calls. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Equal Time: Meeting notes with speaking-time and inclusion analytics We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. EventCAT: AI platform that delivers real-time subtitles and voice interpretation in 50+ languages for conferences, webinars, and online meetings. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. Evernote AI Meeting Notes: Evernote's built-in feature that records meeting audio, transcribes it with speaker recognition, and summarizes it inside your notes. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.