Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. Great Question: All-in-one UX research platform combining recruitment, scheduling, and AI analysis of interviews into a connected research repository. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist Daisy when recording and transcribing meetings privately on a mac without cloud upload matters most, and Great Question when auto-summarizing and tagging interview sessions with ai matters most. Trial each on a few real meetings before you commit — the better fit usually shows fast.
Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server.
All-in-one UX research platform combining recruitment, scheduling, and AI analysis of interviews into a connected research repository.
Daisy, from Addicted Studio, is a local-first meeting recorder and AI notes application for macOS that records meetings on the Mac, transcribes them on the device, and then exposes the captured conversations as a local MCP server for AI tools. It captures both microphone and system audio from any source, including Zoom, Google Meet, Telegram, and other apps, using ScreenCaptureKit, and performs on-device transcription with WhisperKit plus speaker identification via Pyannote diarization, so audio never leaves the Mac unless the user explicitly enables a cloud LLM provider. Beyond raw transcription, Daisy generates structured notes with action items and follow-ups and supports multiple summarization backends including Apple Intelligence, Anthropic, and OpenAI, as well as MCP. Because it runs a local MCP server, tools such as Claude Desktop and Cursor can read recorded meetings directly, and Daisy can export results to Notion, Linear, Attio, Slack, or arbitrary webhooks. It offers several capture modes covering meeting recording, voice dictation, and quick voice notes. Daisy is a native Mac application (not Electron) for Apple Silicon, is fully open source on GitHub under the Apache 2.0 license, and emphasizes privacy with no telemetry, tracking, or required account. The project maintains a product site at mydaisy.io with installation, FAQ, and support documentation. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Great Question is a UX research platform that consolidates participant recruitment, study setup, and AI analysis into a single workflow for product managers, designers, UX researchers, and research operations teams. On the recruitment side it offers access to a large participant panel, the ability to build customer panels from CRM systems, automated screening, eligibility rules, incentive payments, and a research calendar for scheduling one-on-one, collective, or round-robin interviews. For conducting research it supports moderated user interviews, AI-moderated interviews, unmoderated prototype testing with Figma, surveys, card sorting, tree testing, and focus groups, with observer rooms for live team participation. After sessions, Great Question's AI analysis generates summaries, chapters, highlights, and tags, and builds a searchable research repository where transcripts, themes, highlight reels, and insights are connected so teams can query their entire body of research. It offers a wide range of integrations and an MCP that lets users run and analyze research from AI tools, and meets enterprise requirements with SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, and HIPAA compliance. The platform aims to take research from recruitment through synthesis without stitching together multiple tools. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Daisy is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Great Question is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Daisy | Great Question |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Local recording of mic and system audio from any source via ScreenCaptureKit | AI analysis generating summaries, chapters, highlights, and tags from interviews |
| Standout feature | On-device transcription with WhisperKit and speaker diarization via Pyannote | Searchable research repository connecting transcripts, themes, and insights |
| Team usage | Structured AI notes with action items and follow-ups | Participant recruitment from a large panel plus CRM-based custom panels |
| Integrations | Multiple summarization backends: Apple Intelligence, Anthropic, OpenAI, and MCP | Scheduling, screening, eligibility rules, and incentive payments |
| Languages & capture | Local MCP server so Claude Desktop, Cursor, and similar tools can read meetings | Moderated, AI-moderated, and unmoderated study methods including prototype testing |
| Best-fit workflow | Exports to Notion, Linear, Attio, Slack, or custom webhooks | 50+ integrations plus an MCP for running research from AI tools |
Daisy
Choose Daisy if you need recording and transcribing meetings privately on a mac without cloud upload — strengths include fully local-first with audio kept on-device unless a cloud llm is explicitly enabled.
Great Question
Choose Great Question if you need recruiting participants and scheduling user interviews end to end — strengths include handles recruitment, study execution, and analysis in one platform.
Daisy
Great Question
It depends on your workflow. Daisy is strong for recording and transcribing meetings privately on a mac without cloud upload, while Great Question is strong for recruiting participants and scheduling user interviews end to end. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Daisy is a free tier with paid upgrades and Great Question is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Sure. Running both makes sense when their strengths don't overlap and the budget allows.
More head-to-head comparisons involving Daisy and Great Question.
Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. Deepting: Real-time AI transcription and meeting summary app for meetings, interviews, and lectures across mobile and web. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.
Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. Demodesk: AI sales meeting platform that records, transcribes, coaches reps, and automates note-taking, follow-ups, and CRM updates. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.
Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. DepoDash: Cloud court-reporting platform delivering verbatim deposition transcription via AI, stenographers, or voice writers. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. Deposely: AI deposition platform for litigators covering prep, real-time insights, and transcript review and summaries. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. Descript: Video/podcast editor with transcription and meeting recording Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. Dialpad: AI-powered communications platform with a sales dialer that provides real-time transcription, live coaching cards, and post-call summaries. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. Dicte: Privacy-focused AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and voice notes on mobile and desktop. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. Dovetail: Customer insights platform that centralizes interviews and feedback, with AI transcription, analysis, search, and a research repository. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. Dscout: Experience research platform for moderated interviews, diary studies, and usability testing with AI transcription, themes, and analysis. The right pick comes down to team size, budget, and the workflows you want to automate.
Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. Echometer: Psychology-based platform for agile retrospectives, recurring team health checks, and structured 1:1 meetings with AI-assisted suggestions. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. Edisyn: Real-time AI meeting assistant from a Turkish-founded team that listens to calls and provides live notes, summaries, and suggested questions and answers. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Daisy: Local-first, open-source macOS meeting recorder and AI notes app that transcribes on-device and exposes meetings to AI tools through a local MCP server. Efficlose: An AI meeting platform offering a bot-free Chrome extension plus desktop and web apps that transcribe, summarize, and extract action items from calls. Which one wins depends on your platform mix, budget, and how hands-off you want notes to be.