Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist Anarlog when engineers and developers wanting private, bot-free meeting notes matters most, and Speakr when extracting action items and decisions from recorded calls matters most. Test each on your own meetings; the right choice tends to become obvious quickly.
Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Anarlog is an open-source, local-first AI meeting notetaker developed by Fastrepl, Inc., the team behind the project previously known as Hyprnote and Char. It is positioned as an open-source alternative to cloud meeting-notes tools and is designed for people who want to keep meeting data under their own control. Instead of sending a bot into a call, Anarlog captures system audio directly on the user's computer, transcribes it locally, and merges the transcript with short notes the user jots down during the meeting to produce structured, editable summaries with action items. Audio, transcripts, and notes are stored as files on the local disk rather than in an external service, and users can choose between running local AI models or supplying their own API keys for cloud processing. The application is available for Apple Silicon Macs and its codebase is published on GitHub under a GPL license, so it can be inspected, forked, and self-hosted. Anarlog is best for engineers, privacy-conscious professionals, and teams that want bot-free meeting notes with full ownership of their data. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Speakr is a self-hosted web application designed for transcribing audio recordings such as meetings, generating concise summaries and titles, and interacting with the content through a chat interface. It runs entirely on the user's own server, giving full control over data, and is dual-licensed under AGPL-3.0 and a commercial license. The project is actively maintained, with a v0.9.0-alpha release dated June 2026 and over 970 commits. Speakr produces transcripts with automatic language detection and optional AI-powered speaker diarization so users can see who said what. Its summarization can be customized with prompts, and meeting summaries include an action-items view that filters out general discussion to surface decisions, tasks, deadlines, and calendar-worthy events. For deeper interaction, a per-recording chat lets users ask questions about a single recording, while an experimental Inquire Mode provides semantic search and natural-language chat across an entire library of recordings. Speakr can capture system or browser-tab audio, supports configurable AI models and endpoints compatible with OpenAI, OpenRouter, and local models, and includes multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, an admin dashboard, and export and sharing tools aimed at privacy-conscious teams. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Anarlog is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Anarlog | Speakr |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-free capture via local system-audio recording | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection |
| Standout feature | Local transcription with notes merged into structured summaries | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization |
| Team usage | Data stored as files on the user's own device | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks |
| Integrations | Choice of local AI models or bring-your-own API keys | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library |
| Languages & capture | Open-source codebase available on GitHub | System and browser-tab audio capture |
| Best-fit workflow | Action-item extraction from meeting notes | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard |
Anarlog
Choose Anarlog if you need engineers and developers wanting private, bot-free meeting notes — strengths include open source with a publicly available codebase.
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
Anarlog
Speakr
It depends on your workflow. Anarlog is strong for engineers and developers wanting private, bot-free meeting notes, while Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Anarlog is a free tier with paid upgrades and Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Sure. Running both makes sense when their strengths don't overlap and the budget allows.
More head-to-head comparisons involving Anarlog and Speakr.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. AskElephant: AI workflow platform for revenue teams that captures calls and meetings and automates CRM updates, handoffs, and coaching. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Aspect: AI interview assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes recruiting interviews, then autofills ATS scorecards. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Attendee: Open-source, self-hostable meeting bot API that sends bots into Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams to capture recordings and transcripts. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Attention: AI conversation intelligence platform that records and transcribes sales calls, scores them against frameworks, and automates CRM updates and follow-ups. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Attio Call Intelligence: Attio's native call intelligence records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and syncs every conversation to the Attio CRM automatically. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. AudioNotes: AI note taker for voice, audio, video, and text that records meetings and memos and turns them into structured notes and summaries. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. AudiosTranscribe: French-focused, bot-free meeting transcription tool with European inference, summaries, action plans, and automatic audio deletion. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Audiosum: AI transcription platform with Arabic dialect support that transcribes and summarizes meetings, lectures and videos. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Auris AI: Southeast Asia–built AI platform for transcribing audio and video, generating subtitles, and producing meeting and lecture notes across regional languages. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. AutoMemo: Japanese transcription AI from Sourcenext that records meetings via web app, smartphone app, or dedicated voice recorders, then transcribes, summarizes, and shares. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Ava: AI live captioning and transcription app for accessibility, providing real-time captions for conversations and video meetings. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.