Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Klu: AI meeting notetaker and automation platform that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings, then logs outcomes and action items to CRMs and team tools. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
Shortlist Anarlog when engineers and developers wanting private, bot-free meeting notes matters most, and Klu when teams that want meeting follow-ups auto-assigned and routed into slack or notion matters most. Run both through a week of actual calls to see which suits your workflow.
Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot.
AI meeting notetaker and automation platform that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings, then logs outcomes and action items to CRMs and team tools.
Anarlog is an open-source, local-first AI meeting notetaker developed by Fastrepl, Inc., the team behind the project previously known as Hyprnote and Char. It is positioned as an open-source alternative to cloud meeting-notes tools and is designed for people who want to keep meeting data under their own control. Instead of sending a bot into a call, Anarlog captures system audio directly on the user's computer, transcribes it locally, and merges the transcript with short notes the user jots down during the meeting to produce structured, editable summaries with action items. Audio, transcripts, and notes are stored as files on the local disk rather than in an external service, and users can choose between running local AI models or supplying their own API keys for cloud processing. The application is available for Apple Silicon Macs and its codebase is published on GitHub under a GPL license, so it can be inspected, forked, and self-hosted. Anarlog is best for engineers, privacy-conscious professionals, and teams that want bot-free meeting notes with full ownership of their data. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Klu (klu.so) is an AI meeting assistant that positions itself as a meeting automation platform for modern teams rather than a transcription-only tool. It captures meetings through a browser extension that can auto-join calls, a Mac desktop app, and offline capture for in-person conversations. During and after a meeting, Klu produces a transcript with speaker recognition, generates bullet-point summaries, surfaces action items, and supports custom note sections, alongside a smart-search and Ask AI capability for retrieving details from past conversations. A Deep Dive feature lets users ask questions that span multiple meetings, such as what was committed to with a particular account over a period of time. On the workflow side, Klu detects follow-ups, assigns them to owners with deadlines, and can push them into tools like Slack and Notion. For CRM users, Klu logs meeting outcomes to HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive on the relevant record, and connects to additional CRMs such as Attio and Affinity through Zapier, helping keep deals and accounts current without manual data entry. It maintains comparison pages against established notetakers and supports multilingual transcription. Pricing varies by plan. Check the official website for current pricing.
Best suited for
Anarlog is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Klu is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Anarlog | Klu |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-free capture via local system-audio recording | Browser extension auto-join, Mac desktop app, and offline in-person capture |
| Standout feature | Local transcription with notes merged into structured summaries | Real-time transcription with speaker recognition and multilingual support |
| Team usage | Data stored as files on the user's own device | AI-generated bullet-point summaries, action items, and custom note sections |
| Integrations | Choice of local AI models or bring-your-own API keys | Follow-up detection with owner assignment and deadlines, pushed to Slack or Notion |
| Languages & capture | Open-source codebase available on GitHub | CRM logging to HubSpot, Salesforce, and Pipedrive; Attio/Affinity via Zapier |
| Best-fit workflow | Action-item extraction from meeting notes | Cross-meeting Deep Dive and Ask AI search across past meetings |
Anarlog
Choose Anarlog if you need engineers and developers wanting private, bot-free meeting notes — strengths include open source with a publicly available codebase.
Klu
Choose Klu if you need sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls — strengths include combines meeting notes with follow-up assignment and crm logging in one tool.
Anarlog
Klu
It depends on your workflow. Anarlog is strong for engineers and developers wanting private, bot-free meeting notes, while Klu is strong for sales teams keeping hubspot, salesforce, or pipedrive records updated after calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Anarlog is a free tier with paid upgrades and Klu is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
You can — some teams pair them when each covers a different part of the meeting workflow.
More head-to-head comparisons involving Anarlog and Klu.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. AskElephant: AI workflow platform for revenue teams that captures calls and meetings and automates CRM updates, handoffs, and coaching. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Aspect: AI interview assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes recruiting interviews, then autofills ATS scorecards. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Attendee: Open-source, self-hostable meeting bot API that sends bots into Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams to capture recordings and transcripts. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Attention: AI conversation intelligence platform that records and transcribes sales calls, scores them against frameworks, and automates CRM updates and follow-ups. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Attio Call Intelligence: Attio's native call intelligence records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and syncs every conversation to the Attio CRM automatically. This comparison weighs them on pricing, features, and everyday workflow fit.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. AudioNotes: AI note taker for voice, audio, video, and text that records meetings and memos and turns them into structured notes and summaries. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. AudiosTranscribe: French-focused, bot-free meeting transcription tool with European inference, summaries, action plans, and automatic audio deletion. Here's where each one pulls ahead on pricing, features, and the meetings it suits best.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Audiosum: AI transcription platform with Arabic dialect support that transcribes and summarizes meetings, lectures and videos. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Aurelius: Research repository and insights platform for tagging interview data, surfacing themes, and keeping qualitative insights discoverable over time. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Auris AI: Southeast Asia–built AI platform for transcribing audio and video, generating subtitles, and producing meeting and lecture notes across regional languages. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. AutoMemo: Japanese transcription AI from Sourcenext that records meetings via web app, smartphone app, or dedicated voice recorders, then transcribes, summarizes, and shares. Below, they line up on price, capture method, and how each fits a real meeting stack.
Anarlog: Open-source, local-first AI meeting notepad (formerly Hyprnote) by Fastrepl that records and summarizes private meetings on your own device with no bot. Ava: AI live captioning and transcription app for accessibility, providing real-time captions for conversations and video meetings. We compare them on cost, capture approach, and day-to-day fit so you can choose faster.