StenoAI and toruno are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. StenoAI: Open-source desktop app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on-device with no bots, subscriptions, or cloud processing. toruno: Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist StenoAI when capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud matters most, and toruno when japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source desktop app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on-device with no bots, subscriptions, or cloud processing.
Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings.
StenoAI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | StenoAI | toruno |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | On-device transcription with Parakeet TDT v3 (Apple Silicon) or Whisper models | Combined transcription, audio recording, and screen capture of meetings |
| Standout feature | System audio and microphone capture via native Core Audio Tap (no bots) | Real-time transcription via Windows desktop app, plus iPhone and file-upload capture |
| Team usage | Real-time on-screen speaker labels distinguishing you from others | AI-generated summaries with customizable minutes templates |
| Integrations | Local LLM summaries through Ollama, with remote Ollama server support | Japanese-first transcription with English and Chinese support on higher plans |
| Languages & capture | 25 European languages live, up to 99 languages via Whisper after recording | Enterprise security: two-factor authentication and IP restrictions |
| Best-fit workflow | Markdown export of transcripts and summaries | Per-user permission management over transcriptions |
StenoAI
Choose StenoAI if you need capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud — strengths include fully local, bot-free capture with no cloud processing or subscriptions for core use.
toruno
Choose toruno if you need japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations — strengths include screen capture alongside transcript preserves visual context from meetings.
StenoAI
toruno
It depends on your workflow. StenoAI is strong for capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud, while toruno is strong for japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
StenoAI is a free tier with paid upgrades and toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.