StenoAI and Tiro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. StenoAI: Open-source desktop app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on-device with no bots, subscriptions, or cloud processing. Tiro: Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist StenoAI when capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud matters most, and Tiro when korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source desktop app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on-device with no bots, subscriptions, or cloud processing.
Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages.
StenoAI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | StenoAI | Tiro |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | On-device transcription with Parakeet TDT v3 (Apple Silicon) or Whisper models | Real-time transcription with low latency and quick formatted summaries |
| Standout feature | System audio and microphone capture via native Core Audio Tap (no bots) | Strong Korean and Japanese support plus many other languages |
| Team usage | Real-time on-screen speaker labels distinguishing you from others | Real-time translation across multiple languages |
| Integrations | Local LLM summaries through Ollama, with remote Ollama server support | Speaker diarization and one-click note templates |
| Languages & capture | 25 European languages live, up to 99 languages via Whisper after recording | AI chat to ask questions about a meeting |
| Best-fit workflow | Markdown export of transcripts and summaries | Web, desktop (Windows/Mac), and mobile (iOS/Android) capture |
StenoAI
Choose StenoAI if you need capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud — strengths include fully local, bot-free capture with no cloud processing or subscriptions for core use.
Tiro
Choose Tiro if you need korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes — strengths include optimized for korean and japanese, a gap in many western-built tools.
StenoAI
Tiro
It depends on your workflow. StenoAI is strong for capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud, while Tiro is strong for korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
StenoAI is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.