StenoAI and Tana are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. StenoAI: Open-source desktop app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on-device with no bots, subscriptions, or cloud processing. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist StenoAI when capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud matters most, and Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source desktop app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on-device with no bots, subscriptions, or cloud processing.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
StenoAI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | StenoAI | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | On-device transcription with Parakeet TDT v3 (Apple Silicon) or Whisper models | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio |
| Standout feature | System audio and microphone capture via native Core Audio Tap (no bots) | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings |
| Team usage | Real-time on-screen speaker labels distinguishing you from others | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace |
| Integrations | Local LLM summaries through Ollama, with remote Ollama server support | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects |
| Languages & capture | 25 European languages live, up to 99 languages via Whisper after recording | Automatic meeting detection on Mac |
| Best-fit workflow | Markdown export of transcripts and summaries | 60+ language support with automatic detection |
StenoAI
Choose StenoAI if you need capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud — strengths include fully local, bot-free capture with no cloud processing or subscriptions for core use.
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
StenoAI
Tana
It depends on your workflow. StenoAI is strong for capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud, while Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
StenoAI is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.