Speakr and StenoAI are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Speakr: Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search. StenoAI: Open-source desktop app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on-device with no bots, subscriptions, or cloud processing. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Speakr when privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings matters most, and StenoAI when capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Self-hosted web app for transcribing meeting recordings with diarization, summaries, action items, per-recording chat, and library-wide semantic search.
Open-source desktop app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on-device with no bots, subscriptions, or cloud processing.
Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); StenoAI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Speakr | StenoAI |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Self-hosted transcription with automatic language detection | On-device transcription with Parakeet TDT v3 (Apple Silicon) or Whisper models |
| Standout feature | Optional AI-powered speaker diarization | System audio and microphone capture via native Core Audio Tap (no bots) |
| Team usage | Customizable summaries plus an action-items view for decisions and tasks | Real-time on-screen speaker labels distinguishing you from others |
| Integrations | Per-recording chat and an Inquire Mode for semantic search across the whole library | Local LLM summaries through Ollama, with remote Ollama server support |
| Languages & capture | System and browser-tab audio capture | 25 European languages live, up to 99 languages via Whisper after recording |
| Best-fit workflow | Multi-user support with SSO, group workspaces, and admin dashboard | Markdown export of transcripts and summaries |
Speakr
Choose Speakr if you need privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings — strengths include runs entirely on the user's own infrastructure for full data control.
StenoAI
Choose StenoAI if you need capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud — strengths include fully local, bot-free capture with no cloud processing or subscriptions for core use.
Speakr
StenoAI
It depends on your workflow. Speakr is strong for privacy-conscious teams self-hosting transcription and summaries for internal meetings, while StenoAI is strong for capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Speakr is a free tier with paid upgrades and StenoAI is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.