Note67 and StenoAI are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Note67: A private, local-first desktop app that records meetings, transcribes them on-device with Whisper, and generates AI summaries via local models. StenoAI: Open-source desktop app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on-device with no bots, subscriptions, or cloud processing. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Note67 when recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings matters most, and StenoAI when capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); StenoAI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
On-device transcription with Parakeet TDT v3 (Apple Silicon) or Whisper models
Standout feature
AI summaries generated by local language models via Ollama
System audio and microphone capture via native Core Audio Tap (no bots)
Team usage
Captures both microphone and system audio
Real-time on-screen speaker labels distinguishing you from others
Integrations
Separates the user's voice from other meeting participants
Local LLM summaries through Ollama, with remote Ollama server support
Languages & capture
Native desktop app for macOS and Windows
25 European languages live, up to 99 languages via Whisper after recording
Best-fit workflow
Privacy-first design that keeps audio on the device
Markdown export of transcripts and summaries
Best for
Note67
Choose Note67 if you need recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings — strengths include local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine.
StenoAI
Choose StenoAI if you need capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud — strengths include fully local, bot-free capture with no cloud processing or subscriptions for core use.
Pros & cons
Note67
+ Local processing keeps meeting audio and transcripts on the user's machine
+ Suited to confidentiality and compliance-sensitive use cases
- Local AI models depend on the user's own hardware for performance
StenoAI
+ Fully local, bot-free capture with no cloud processing or subscriptions for core use
+ MIT-licensed and open source, with active 2026 releases
- Primary support is macOS on Apple Silicon; Windows build is alpha and Intel Mac support ended at v0.3.8
FAQ
Is Note67 or StenoAI better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Note67 is strong for recording and summarizing confidential client or internal meetings, while StenoAI is strong for capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Note67 and StenoAI compare on price?
Note67 is a free tier with paid upgrades and StenoAI is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Note67 and StenoAI?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.
Note67 vs StenoAI: Pricing, Features & Recommendation | Hosiqo