KI-note and StenoAI are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. KI-note: Austrian AI transcription and meeting-minutes tool with European data processing, speaker labels, and Word/PDF export. StenoAI: Open-source desktop app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on-device with no bots, subscriptions, or cloud processing. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist KI-note when producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations matters most, and StenoAI when capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); StenoAI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews
On-device transcription with Parakeet TDT v3 (Apple Silicon) or Whisper models
Standout feature
Automated AI summaries with speaker assignment
System audio and microphone capture via native Core Audio Tap (no bots)
Team usage
Canvas-style protocol editing interface
Real-time on-screen speaker labels distinguishing you from others
Integrations
Export to PDF and Word, with support for M4A, WAV and MP3 input
Local LLM summaries through Ollama, with remote Ollama server support
Languages & capture
Data processed in Austria with GDPR-compliant retention controls
25 European languages live, up to 99 languages via Whisper after recording
Best-fit workflow
Audio-to-text transcription for meetings and interviews
Markdown export of transcripts and summaries
Best for
KI-note
Choose KI-note if you need producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations — strengths include european, austria-based processing with a gdpr-compliant focus.
StenoAI
Choose StenoAI if you need capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud — strengths include fully local, bot-free capture with no cloud processing or subscriptions for core use.
Pros & cons
KI-note
+ European, Austria-based processing with a GDPR-compliant focus
+ Editable protocol output plus standard document export formats
- Upload-based transcription rather than a live meeting bot
StenoAI
+ Fully local, bot-free capture with no cloud processing or subscriptions for core use
+ MIT-licensed and open source, with active 2026 releases
- Primary support is macOS on Apple Silicon; Windows build is alpha and Intel Mac support ended at v0.3.8
FAQ
Is KI-note or StenoAI better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. KI-note is strong for producing gdpr-compliant meeting minutes for austrian and dach organizations, while StenoAI is strong for capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do KI-note and StenoAI compare on price?
KI-note is a free tier with paid upgrades and StenoAI is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both KI-note and StenoAI?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.