Jamie and StenoAI are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Jamie: A bot-free AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes online and in-person meetings via a desktop app, producing notes and action items in 99+ languages. StenoAI: Open-source desktop app that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings entirely on-device with no bots, subscriptions, or cloud processing. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Jamie when capturing meeting notes and action items while staying fully present in the conversation matters most, and StenoAI when capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
A bot-free AI meeting assistant that records, transcribes, and summarizes online and in-person meetings via a desktop app, producing notes and action items in 99+ languages.
Jamie is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); StenoAI is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
On-device transcription with Parakeet TDT v3 (Apple Silicon) or Whisper models
Standout feature
Transcription & summaries
System audio and microphone capture via native Core Audio Tap (no bots)
Team usage
Action item detection
Real-time on-screen speaker labels distinguishing you from others
Integrations
Ask Jamie (meeting Q&A)
Local LLM summaries through Ollama, with remote Ollama server support
Languages & capture
Speaker labeling & memory
25 European languages live, up to 99 languages via Whisper after recording
Best-fit workflow
Bot-free recording
Markdown export of transcripts and summaries
Best for
Jamie
Choose Jamie if you need capturing meeting notes and action items while staying fully present in the conversation — strengths include bot-free: captures audio locally via a desktop app, so no bot joins or appears in the call.
StenoAI
Choose StenoAI if you need capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud — strengths include fully local, bot-free capture with no cloud processing or subscriptions for core use.
Pros & cons
Jamie
+ Bot-free: captures audio locally via a desktop app, so no bot joins or appears in the call
+ Works for both online meetings (any platform) and in-person/offline meetings
- Requires installing a desktop app rather than running fully in the browser or cloud
StenoAI
+ Fully local, bot-free capture with no cloud processing or subscriptions for core use
+ MIT-licensed and open source, with active 2026 releases
- Primary support is macOS on Apple Silicon; Windows build is alpha and Intel Mac support ended at v0.3.8
FAQ
Is Jamie or StenoAI better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Jamie is strong for capturing meeting notes and action items while staying fully present in the conversation, while StenoAI is strong for capturing and summarizing confidential meetings without sending audio to the cloud. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Jamie and StenoAI compare on price?
Jamie is a free tier with paid upgrades and StenoAI is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Jamie and StenoAI?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.