WhisperLiveKit and tl;dv are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. WhisperLiveKit: Open-source, self-hosted real-time speech-to-text and speaker diarization toolkit with a FastAPI server and web interface, suitable for meeting transcription. tl;dv: Video-first AI meeting recorder with searchable clips, 30+ language transcription, and EU/GDPR-friendly hosting. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist WhisperLiveKit when self-hosted real-time meeting transcription with speaker labels matters most, and tl;dv when teams sharing video highlights matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, self-hosted real-time speech-to-text and speaker diarization toolkit with a FastAPI server and web interface, suitable for meeting transcription.
FastAPI backend with OpenAI-compatible REST API and Deepgram-compatible WebSocket protocolIncluded customizable HTML/JavaScript web interface and Docker images (GPU and CPU)Multiple ASR backends (Whisper variants, Voxtral, Qwen3-ASR) and 200+ language support with translation
WhisperLiveKit is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); tl;dv is from $18/mo (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Real-time streaming speech-to-text with low latency over WebSocket
Video clips
Standout feature
Real-time speaker diarization to distinguish multiple speakers
30+ languages
Team usage
FastAPI backend with OpenAI-compatible REST API and Deepgram-compatible WebSocket protocol
EU/GDPR hosting
Integrations
Multiple ASR backends (Whisper variants, Voxtral, Qwen3-ASR) and 200+ language support with translation
Speaker recognition
Languages & capture
Included customizable HTML/JavaScript web interface and Docker images (GPU and CPU)
Video clips
Best-fit workflow
Voice activity detection and multi-user support on a single backend
30+ languages
Best for
WhisperLiveKit
Choose WhisperLiveKit if you need self-hosted real-time meeting transcription with speaker labels — strengths include fully open source (apache 2.0) and self-hostable for private, on-premise transcription.
tl;dv
Choose tl;dv if you need teams sharing video highlights — strengths include free plan with unlimited recording and 30+ language transcription.
Pros & cons
WhisperLiveKit
+ Fully open source (Apache 2.0) and self-hostable for private, on-premise transcription
+ Real-time diarization and low-latency streaming designed for live scenarios like meetings
- Requires technical setup and, for best performance, GPU hardware
tl;dv
+ Free plan with unlimited recording and 30+ language transcription
+ Shareable video clips and timestamps
- Free plan keeps recordings only 3 months and caps AI notes at 10 for the account's lifetime
FAQ
Is WhisperLiveKit or tl;dv better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. WhisperLiveKit is strong for self-hosted real-time meeting transcription with speaker labels, while tl;dv is strong for teams sharing video highlights. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do WhisperLiveKit and tl;dv compare on price?
WhisperLiveKit is a free tier with paid upgrades and tl;dv is from $18/mo. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both WhisperLiveKit and tl;dv?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.