WhisperLiveKit and timeOS are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. WhisperLiveKit: Open-source, self-hosted real-time speech-to-text and speaker diarization toolkit with a FastAPI server and web interface, suitable for meeting transcription. timeOS: AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist WhisperLiveKit when self-hosted real-time meeting transcription with speaker labels matters most, and timeOS when automated post-meeting workflows matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Open-source, self-hosted real-time speech-to-text and speaker diarization toolkit with a FastAPI server and web interface, suitable for meeting transcription.
AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools.
WhisperLiveKit is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | WhisperLiveKit | timeOS |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Real-time streaming speech-to-text with low latency over WebSocket | Automatic capture and transcription |
| Standout feature | Real-time speaker diarization to distinguish multiple speakers | AI summaries and action items |
| Team usage | FastAPI backend with OpenAI-compatible REST API and Deepgram-compatible WebSocket protocol | Sync notes to docs and task tools |
| Integrations | Multiple ASR backends (Whisper variants, Voxtral, Qwen3-ASR) and 200+ language support with translation | Multi-language support |
| Languages & capture | Included customizable HTML/JavaScript web interface and Docker images (GPU and CPU) | Shareable recaps |
| Best-fit workflow | Voice activity detection and multi-user support on a single backend | Automatic capture and transcription |
WhisperLiveKit
Choose WhisperLiveKit if you need self-hosted real-time meeting transcription with speaker labels — strengths include fully open source (apache 2.0) and self-hostable for private, on-premise transcription.
timeOS
Choose timeOS if you need automated post-meeting workflows — strengths include automates post-meeting follow-up across tools.
WhisperLiveKit
timeOS
It depends on your workflow. WhisperLiveKit is strong for self-hosted real-time meeting transcription with speaker labels, while timeOS is strong for automated post-meeting workflows. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
WhisperLiveKit is a free tier with paid upgrades and timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.