WAVV and toruno are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. WAVV: CRM-embedded multi-line dialer with call recording and live listen-in coaching, focused on real estate and insurance sales. toruno: Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist WAVV when real estate and insurance agents prospecting at high call volume matters most, and toruno when japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
CRM-embedded multi-line dialer with call recording and live listen-in coaching, focused on real estate and insurance sales.
Analytics and reporting on call outcomes and agent performanceCall recording for training and quality assuranceCRM-embedded operation (HighLevel and other CRMs)
WAVV is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Multi-line dialer that connects reps to live answers
Combined transcription, audio recording, and screen capture of meetings
Standout feature
CRM-embedded operation (HighLevel and other CRMs)
Real-time transcription via Windows desktop app, plus iPhone and file-upload capture
Team usage
Call recording for training and quality assurance
AI-generated summaries with customizable minutes templates
Integrations
Live call monitoring and supervisor listen-in coaching
Japanese-first transcription with English and Chinese support on higher plans
Languages & capture
Voicemail drop for pre-recorded messages
Enterprise security: two-factor authentication and IP restrictions
Best-fit workflow
Local-presence dialing
Per-user permission management over transcriptions
Best for
WAVV
Choose WAVV if you need real estate and insurance agents prospecting at high call volume — strengths include embeds directly into crms so reps work without switching tools.
toruno
Choose toruno if you need japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations — strengths include screen capture alongside transcript preserves visual context from meetings.
Pros & cons
WAVV
+ Embeds directly into CRMs so reps work without switching tools
- Strongly oriented toward real estate and insurance use cases
toruno
+ Screen capture alongside transcript preserves visual context from meetings
+ Backed by Ricoh with enterprise security and administration controls
- Real-time transcription is tied to the Windows desktop app
FAQ
Is WAVV or toruno better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. WAVV is strong for real estate and insurance agents prospecting at high call volume, while toruno is strong for japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do WAVV and toruno compare on price?
WAVV is a free tier with paid upgrades and toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both WAVV and toruno?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.