WAVV and timeOS are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. WAVV: CRM-embedded multi-line dialer with call recording and live listen-in coaching, focused on real estate and insurance sales. timeOS: AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist WAVV when real estate and insurance agents prospecting at high call volume matters most, and timeOS when automated post-meeting workflows matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
CRM-embedded multi-line dialer with call recording and live listen-in coaching, focused on real estate and insurance sales.
Analytics and reporting on call outcomes and agent performanceCall recording for training and quality assuranceCRM-embedded operation (HighLevel and other CRMs)
WAVV is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Multi-line dialer that connects reps to live answers
Automatic capture and transcription
Standout feature
CRM-embedded operation (HighLevel and other CRMs)
AI summaries and action items
Team usage
Call recording for training and quality assurance
Sync notes to docs and task tools
Integrations
Live call monitoring and supervisor listen-in coaching
Multi-language support
Languages & capture
Voicemail drop for pre-recorded messages
Shareable recaps
Best-fit workflow
Local-presence dialing
Automatic capture and transcription
Best for
WAVV
Choose WAVV if you need real estate and insurance agents prospecting at high call volume — strengths include embeds directly into crms so reps work without switching tools.
timeOS
Choose timeOS if you need automated post-meeting workflows — strengths include automates post-meeting follow-up across tools.
Pros & cons
WAVV
+ Embeds directly into CRMs so reps work without switching tools
- Strongly oriented toward real estate and insurance use cases
timeOS
+ Automates post-meeting follow-up across tools
+ Works across major platforms
- Joins meetings to capture them
FAQ
Is WAVV or timeOS better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. WAVV is strong for real estate and insurance agents prospecting at high call volume, while timeOS is strong for automated post-meeting workflows. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do WAVV and timeOS compare on price?
WAVV is a free tier with paid upgrades and timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both WAVV and timeOS?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.