Wave and WhisperLiveKit are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Wave: Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries. WhisperLiveKit: Open-source, self-hosted real-time speech-to-text and speaker diarization toolkit with a FastAPI server and web interface, suitable for meeting transcription. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Wave when recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining matters most, and WhisperLiveKit when self-hosted real-time meeting transcription with speaker labels matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries.
Open-source, self-hosted real-time speech-to-text and speaker diarization toolkit with a FastAPI server and web interface, suitable for meeting transcription.
Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); WhisperLiveKit is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Wave | WhisperLiveKit |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Records meetings, calls, lectures, and voice memos | Real-time streaming speech-to-text with low latency over WebSocket |
| Standout feature | Bot-free tab audio capture plus combined tab and mic mode | Real-time speaker diarization to distinguish multiple speakers |
| Team usage | Speaker-labeled transcripts with summaries and action items | FastAPI backend with OpenAI-compatible REST API and Deepgram-compatible WebSocket protocol |
| Integrations | Apps for iOS, Android, web, Mac, Windows, and Chrome | Multiple ASR backends (Whisper variants, Voxtral, Qwen3-ASR) and 200+ language support with translation |
| Languages & capture | Support for dozens of languages | Included customizable HTML/JavaScript web interface and Docker images (GPU and CPU) |
| Best-fit workflow | Encrypted cloud storage with no model training on user data | Voice activity detection and multi-user support on a single backend |
Wave
Choose Wave if you need recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining — strengths include bot-free capture across many platforms and devices.
WhisperLiveKit
Choose WhisperLiveKit if you need self-hosted real-time meeting transcription with speaker labels — strengths include fully open source (apache 2.0) and self-hostable for private, on-premise transcription.
Wave
WhisperLiveKit
It depends on your workflow. Wave is strong for recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining, while WhisperLiveKit is strong for self-hosted real-time meeting transcription with speaker labels. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades and WhisperLiveKit is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.