Wave and toruno are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Wave: Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries. toruno: Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Wave when recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining matters most, and toruno when japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries.
Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings.
Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Wave | toruno |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Records meetings, calls, lectures, and voice memos | Combined transcription, audio recording, and screen capture of meetings |
| Standout feature | Bot-free tab audio capture plus combined tab and mic mode | Real-time transcription via Windows desktop app, plus iPhone and file-upload capture |
| Team usage | Speaker-labeled transcripts with summaries and action items | AI-generated summaries with customizable minutes templates |
| Integrations | Apps for iOS, Android, web, Mac, Windows, and Chrome | Japanese-first transcription with English and Chinese support on higher plans |
| Languages & capture | Support for dozens of languages | Enterprise security: two-factor authentication and IP restrictions |
| Best-fit workflow | Encrypted cloud storage with no model training on user data | Per-user permission management over transcriptions |
Wave
Choose Wave if you need recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining — strengths include bot-free capture across many platforms and devices.
toruno
Choose toruno if you need japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations — strengths include screen capture alongside transcript preserves visual context from meetings.
Wave
toruno
It depends on your workflow. Wave is strong for recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining, while toruno is strong for japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades and toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.