ViSaver and joinly are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. ViSaver: Russian meeting transcription platform with speaker diarization, fast processing and on-premise and API options. joinly: Open-source, self-hostable connector that lets AI agents join Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams calls to transcribe, listen, and act in real time via MCP. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist ViSaver when transcribing russian-language meetings and webinars matters most, and joinly when building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Russian meeting transcription platform with speaker diarization, fast processing and on-premise and API options.
Open-source, self-hostable connector that lets AI agents join Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams calls to transcribe, listen, and act in real time via MCP.
ViSaver is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); joinly is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | ViSaver | joinly |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Speech-to-text with speaker identification | MCP server that exposes meeting tools (join/leave, transcript, chat, audio control, snapshots) to AI agents |
| Standout feature | Support for 90+ languages with automatic detection | Real-time transcription with timestamps and speaker information, subscribable for live updates |
| Team usage | Playback-synchronized transcript search | Cross-platform support for Google Meet, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and browser-based calls |
| Integrations | Exports to TXT, DOCX and PDF | Modular speech-to-text and text-to-speech backends (Whisper, Deepgram, Kokoro, ElevenLabs) |
| Languages & capture | Supports Zoom, Google Meet, Teams and Yandex Telemost recordings | Model-agnostic: works with OpenAI, Anthropic, and local LLMs via Ollama |
| Best-fit workflow | On-premise installation and REST API for integrations | Docker-based self-hosting with optional CUDA GPU image |
ViSaver
Choose ViSaver if you need transcribing russian-language meetings and webinars — strengths include fast processing of long recordings.
joinly
Choose joinly if you need building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls — strengths include fully open source (mit) and self-hostable for complete data control.
ViSaver
joinly
It depends on your workflow. ViSaver is strong for transcribing russian-language meetings and webinars, while joinly is strong for building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
ViSaver is a free tier with paid upgrades and joinly is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.