Vatis Tech and ownscribe are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Vatis Tech: Speech-to-text platform with developer API, speaker diarization, and meeting transcription tools. ownscribe: Local-first command-line tool that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings on macOS entirely on-device, with natural-language search across notes. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Vatis Tech when transcribing uploaded meeting recordings and generating summaries matters most, and ownscribe when developers capturing and summarizing meetings from the terminal on a mac matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Speech-to-text platform with developer API, speaker diarization, and meeting transcription tools.
Local-first command-line tool that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings on macOS entirely on-device, with natural-language search across notes.
Vatis Tech is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); ownscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Vatis Tech | ownscribe |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Speech-to-text API with Python and JavaScript SDKs | Local-first recording, transcription, and summarization via CLI |
| Standout feature | Speaker diarization for multi-speaker recordings | System audio capture on macOS 14.2+ through Core Audio |
| Team usage | Free meeting transcription and summarization tool | WhisperX transcription with word-level timestamps |
| Integrations | Audio intelligence: sentiment, intent, topics, and PII redaction | Optional speaker diarization via PyAnnote |
| Languages & capture | Multiple export formats (TXT, DOCX, SRT, VTT, JSON, PDF) | Local summarization with a built-in Phi-4-mini model, plus Ollama and OpenAI-compatible backends |
| Best-fit workflow | Cloud and on-premises deployment with enterprise compliance | Natural-language search across meeting notes with the ask command |
Vatis Tech
Choose Vatis Tech if you need transcribing uploaded meeting recordings and generating summaries — strengths include combines a developer api with self-serve meeting tools.
ownscribe
Choose ownscribe if you need developers capturing and summarizing meetings from the terminal on a mac — strengths include runs entirely on-device with no data sent to external servers.
Vatis Tech
ownscribe
It depends on your workflow. Vatis Tech is strong for transcribing uploaded meeting recordings and generating summaries, while ownscribe is strong for developers capturing and summarizing meetings from the terminal on a mac. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Vatis Tech is a free tier with paid upgrades and ownscribe is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.