Traq.ai and Zeplyn are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Traq.ai: Conversation intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes sales calls and links insights to the CRM. Zeplyn: AI meeting assistant for wealth managers that captures structured notes without recording and syncs them to advisor CRMs. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-sales-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-sales-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Traq.ai when documenting sales calls with summaries and action items matters most, and Zeplyn when capturing structured notes from client review and prospect meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Traq.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Zeplyn is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
Recording-free structured note capture from client meetings
Standout feature
AI summaries, action items, and recommended next steps
Support for virtual meetings, in-person meetings, and dictations
Team usage
Sentiment and conversation analytics
Automatic generation of tasks, updates, and follow-up emails
Integrations
CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) and conferencing connectors (Zoom, Teams, Meet)
One-click CRM sync with Salesforce, Redtail, HubSpot, and Wealthbox
Languages & capture
Ask Ava AI assistant to query past conversations
Pre-meeting smart client summaries and discussion agendas
Best-fit workflow
Mobile app for in-person meeting capture
Integrations with Gmail, Outlook, Zoom, Teams, and Google Calendar
Best for
Traq.ai
Choose Traq.ai if you need documenting sales calls with summaries and action items — strengths include links call insights directly to crm prospect and deal records.
Zeplyn
Choose Zeplyn if you need capturing structured notes from client review and prospect meetings — strengths include built specifically for wealth management workflows.
Pros & cons
Traq.ai
+ Links call insights directly to CRM prospect and deal records
+ Searchable repository of conversations via the AI assistant
- Conversation intelligence is most useful with consistent team adoption
Zeplyn
+ Built specifically for wealth management workflows
+ Captures structured financial details and action items, not just raw transcript
- Specialized for financial advisors, limiting fit for other industries
FAQ
Is Traq.ai or Zeplyn better for AI meeting notes?
It depends on your workflow. Traq.ai is strong for documenting sales calls with summaries and action items, while Zeplyn is strong for capturing structured notes from client review and prospect meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
How do Traq.ai and Zeplyn compare on price?
Traq.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades and Zeplyn is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Can I use both Traq.ai and Zeplyn?
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.