Traq.ai and toruno are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Traq.ai: Conversation intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes sales calls and links insights to the CRM. toruno: Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Traq.ai when documenting sales calls with summaries and action items matters most, and toruno when japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Conversation intelligence platform that records, transcribes, and analyzes sales calls and links insights to the CRM.
Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings.
Traq.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Traq.ai | toruno |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Automatic call recording and transcription | Combined transcription, audio recording, and screen capture of meetings |
| Standout feature | AI summaries, action items, and recommended next steps | Real-time transcription via Windows desktop app, plus iPhone and file-upload capture |
| Team usage | Sentiment and conversation analytics | AI-generated summaries with customizable minutes templates |
| Integrations | CRM integrations (HubSpot, Salesforce) and conferencing connectors (Zoom, Teams, Meet) | Japanese-first transcription with English and Chinese support on higher plans |
| Languages & capture | Ask Ava AI assistant to query past conversations | Enterprise security: two-factor authentication and IP restrictions |
| Best-fit workflow | Mobile app for in-person meeting capture | Per-user permission management over transcriptions |
Traq.ai
Choose Traq.ai if you need documenting sales calls with summaries and action items — strengths include links call insights directly to crm prospect and deal records.
toruno
Choose toruno if you need japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations — strengths include screen capture alongside transcript preserves visual context from meetings.
Traq.ai
toruno
It depends on your workflow. Traq.ai is strong for documenting sales calls with summaries and action items, while toruno is strong for japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Traq.ai is a free tier with paid upgrades and toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.