TeamRetro and Wave are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. TeamRetro: Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries. Wave: Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist TeamRetro when running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams matters most, and Wave when recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries.
Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries.
TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | TeamRetro | Wave |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Action-item tracking carried across sessions | Records meetings, calls, lectures, and voice memos |
| Standout feature | Guided retrospective workflow with anonymous input, grouping, and dot voting | Bot-free tab audio capture plus combined tab and mic mode |
| Team usage | AI-assisted automatic grouping of similar ideas into themes | Speaker-labeled transcripts with summaries and action items |
| Integrations | AI-generated retrospective summaries (when enabled by the organization) | Apps for iOS, Android, web, Mac, Windows, and Chrome |
| Languages & capture | Recurring team health checks with trend and sentiment tracking over time | Support for dozens of languages |
| Best-fit workflow | Large library of retrospective templates and icebreaker activities | Encrypted cloud storage with no model training on user data |
TeamRetro
Choose TeamRetro if you need running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams — strengths include purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard.
Wave
Choose Wave if you need recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining — strengths include bot-free capture across many platforms and devices.
TeamRetro
Wave
It depends on your workflow. TeamRetro is strong for running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams, while Wave is strong for recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades and Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.