TeamRetro and Typist are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. TeamRetro: Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries. Typist: AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist TeamRetro when running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams matters most, and Typist when transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
Purpose-built online tool for running agile retrospectives, team health checks, and planning poker with AI-assisted idea grouping and summaries.
AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy.
TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | TeamRetro | Typist |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Guided retrospective workflow with anonymous input, grouping, and dot voting | Audio and video to text transcription across many file formats |
| Standout feature | AI-assisted automatic grouping of similar ideas into themes | Export to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXT |
| Team usage | AI-generated retrospective summaries (when enabled by the organization) | Multiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy |
| Integrations | Recurring team health checks with trend and sentiment tracking over time | Speaker identification on the highest-accuracy tier |
| Languages & capture | Large library of retrospective templates and icebreaker activities | Word-level and segment-level timestamps for clean subtitle timing |
| Best-fit workflow | Action-item tracking carried across sessions | Support for a wide range of languages and accents |
TeamRetro
Choose TeamRetro if you need running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams — strengths include purpose-built for retrospectives rather than a repurposed generic whiteboard.
Typist
Choose Typist if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls — strengths include clean subtitle exports (srt and webvtt) that import into video editors.
TeamRetro
Typist
It depends on your workflow. TeamRetro is strong for running sprint or project retrospectives for distributed agile teams, while Typist is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
TeamRetro is a free tier with paid upgrades and Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.