Tana and Zeck are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. Zeck: Modern board meeting platform that replaces static decks with interactive updates, AI-generated minutes, smart agendas, pre-voting, and digital voting. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-productivity-meeting-tools, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-productivity-meeting-tools workflows, shortlist Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most, and Zeck when preparing and distributing interactive board updates before a meeting matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Modern board meeting platform that replaces static decks with interactive updates, AI-generated minutes, smart agendas, pre-voting, and digital voting.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Zeck is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Tana | Zeck |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio | AI-generated board minutes from agenda blocks, votes, and discussions |
| Standout feature | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | AI-assisted board update creation from reports and notes |
| Team usage | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace | AI summaries of key takeaways from data and charts |
| Integrations | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects | Smart agendas and interactive, mobile-first board updates |
| Languages & capture | Automatic meeting detection on Mac | Pre-vote and digital voting with a centralized automated minutes book |
| Best-fit workflow | 60+ language support with automatic detection | Real-time commenting across board materials |
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Zeck
Choose Zeck if you need preparing and distributing interactive board updates before a meeting — strengths include purpose-built to streamline board meeting prep, execution, and minutes.
Tana
Zeck
It depends on your workflow. Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call, while Zeck is strong for preparing and distributing interactive board updates before a meeting. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades and Zeck is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.