Tana and WAVV are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. WAVV: CRM-embedded multi-line dialer with call recording and live listen-in coaching, focused on real estate and insurance sales. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most, and WAVV when real estate and insurance agents prospecting at high call volume matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
CRM-embedded multi-line dialer with call recording and live listen-in coaching, focused on real estate and insurance sales.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); WAVV is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Tana | WAVV |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio | Multi-line dialer that connects reps to live answers |
| Standout feature | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | CRM-embedded operation (HighLevel and other CRMs) |
| Team usage | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace | Call recording for training and quality assurance |
| Integrations | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects | Live call monitoring and supervisor listen-in coaching |
| Languages & capture | Automatic meeting detection on Mac | Voicemail drop for pre-recorded messages |
| Best-fit workflow | 60+ language support with automatic detection | Local-presence dialing |
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
WAVV
Choose WAVV if you need real estate and insurance agents prospecting at high call volume — strengths include embeds directly into crms so reps work without switching tools.
Tana
WAVV
It depends on your workflow. Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call, while WAVV is strong for real estate and insurance agents prospecting at high call volume. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades and WAVV is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.