Tana and Wave are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. Wave: Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most, and Wave when recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Cross-platform AI note taker that records and transcribes meetings, calls, and voice memos into summaries.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Tana | Wave |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio | Records meetings, calls, lectures, and voice memos |
| Standout feature | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | Bot-free tab audio capture plus combined tab and mic mode |
| Team usage | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace | Speaker-labeled transcripts with summaries and action items |
| Integrations | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects | Apps for iOS, Android, web, Mac, Windows, and Chrome |
| Languages & capture | Automatic meeting detection on Mac | Support for dozens of languages |
| Best-fit workflow | 60+ language support with automatic detection | Encrypted cloud storage with no model training on user data |
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Wave
Choose Wave if you need recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining — strengths include bot-free capture across many platforms and devices.
Tana
Wave
It depends on your workflow. Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call, while Wave is strong for recording browser-based meetings without a bot joining. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades and Wave is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.