Tana and Typist are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. Typist: AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most, and Typist when transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
AI speech-to-text service that converts audio and video into text and exports captions, with tiered models for speed or accuracy.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Tana | Typist |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio | Audio and video to text transcription across many file formats |
| Standout feature | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | Export to SRT subtitles, WebVTT captions, DOCX, PDF, and TXT |
| Team usage | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace | Multiple transcription models trading off speed and accuracy |
| Integrations | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects | Speaker identification on the highest-accuracy tier |
| Languages & capture | Automatic meeting detection on Mac | Word-level and segment-level timestamps for clean subtitle timing |
| Best-fit workflow | 60+ language support with automatic detection | Support for a wide range of languages and accents |
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Typist
Choose Typist if you need transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls — strengths include clean subtitle exports (srt and webvtt) that import into video editors.
Tana
Typist
It depends on your workflow. Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call, while Typist is strong for transcribing recorded interviews and research or client calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades and Typist is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.