Tana and Trellus are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. Trellus: Real-time AI sales coaching and parallel dialer delivered as a lightweight Chrome extension that layers onto existing sales tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most, and Trellus when coaching reps in real time during outbound calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Real-time AI sales coaching and parallel dialer delivered as a lightweight Chrome extension that layers onto existing sales tools.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Trellus is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Tana | Trellus |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio | Real-time, in-call AI coaching and adaptive guidance |
| Standout feature | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | Parallel dialer with multiple simultaneous lines |
| Team usage | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace | Automated voicemail drops and number-health monitoring |
| Integrations | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects | AI voice agents for practice roleplay and inbound qualification |
| Languages & capture | Automatic meeting detection on Mac | Call analytics and performance scoring |
| Best-fit workflow | 60+ language support with automatic detection | Chrome extension that layers onto Salesloft, Outreach, and HubSpot |
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Trellus
Choose Trellus if you need coaching reps in real time during outbound calls — strengths include adds live coaching and dialing without replacing existing tools.
Tana
Trellus
It depends on your workflow. Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call, while Trellus is strong for coaching reps in real time during outbound calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades and Trellus is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.