Tana and toruno are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. toruno: Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most, and toruno when japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Ricoh's Japanese meeting recording service combining transcription, audio recording, and screen capture for online and in-person meetings.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Tana | toruno |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio | Combined transcription, audio recording, and screen capture of meetings |
| Standout feature | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | Real-time transcription via Windows desktop app, plus iPhone and file-upload capture |
| Team usage | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace | AI-generated summaries with customizable minutes templates |
| Integrations | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects | Japanese-first transcription with English and Chinese support on higher plans |
| Languages & capture | Automatic meeting detection on Mac | Enterprise security: two-factor authentication and IP restrictions |
| Best-fit workflow | 60+ language support with automatic detection | Per-user permission management over transcriptions |
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
toruno
Choose toruno if you need japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations — strengths include screen capture alongside transcript preserves visual context from meetings.
Tana
toruno
It depends on your workflow. Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call, while toruno is strong for japanese teams needing searchable records of meetings and business negotiations. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades and toruno is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.