Tana and Tiro are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. Tiro: Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most, and Tiro when korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Real-time AI meeting note-taker from Plato, strong in Korean and Japanese, with fast transcription and translation across many languages.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Tana | Tiro |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio | Real-time transcription with low latency and quick formatted summaries |
| Standout feature | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | Strong Korean and Japanese support plus many other languages |
| Team usage | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace | Real-time translation across multiple languages |
| Integrations | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects | Speaker diarization and one-click note templates |
| Languages & capture | Automatic meeting detection on Mac | AI chat to ask questions about a meeting |
| Best-fit workflow | 60+ language support with automatic detection | Web, desktop (Windows/Mac), and mobile (iOS/Android) capture |
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
Tiro
Choose Tiro if you need korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes — strengths include optimized for korean and japanese, a gap in many western-built tools.
Tana
Tiro
It depends on your workflow. Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call, while Tiro is strong for korean and japanese teams needing accurate native-language meeting notes. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades and Tiro is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.