Tana and timeOS are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. timeOS: AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most, and timeOS when automated post-meeting workflows matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
AI meeting assistant that captures, transcribes, and summarizes meetings and routes notes and action items into your tools.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Tana | timeOS |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio | Automatic capture and transcription |
| Standout feature | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | AI summaries and action items |
| Team usage | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace | Sync notes to docs and task tools |
| Integrations | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects | Multi-language support |
| Languages & capture | Automatic meeting detection on Mac | Shareable recaps |
| Best-fit workflow | 60+ language support with automatic detection | Automatic capture and transcription |
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
timeOS
Choose timeOS if you need automated post-meeting workflows — strengths include automates post-meeting follow-up across tools.
Tana
timeOS
It depends on your workflow. Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call, while timeOS is strong for automated post-meeting workflows. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades and timeOS is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.