Tana and joinly are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. joinly: Open-source, self-hostable connector that lets AI agents join Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams calls to transcribe, listen, and act in real time via MCP. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most, and joinly when building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Open-source, self-hostable connector that lets AI agents join Google Meet, Zoom, and Microsoft Teams calls to transcribe, listen, and act in real time via MCP.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); joinly is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Tana | joinly |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio | MCP server that exposes meeting tools (join/leave, transcript, chat, audio control, snapshots) to AI agents |
| Standout feature | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | Real-time transcription with timestamps and speaker information, subscribable for live updates |
| Team usage | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace | Cross-platform support for Google Meet, Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and browser-based calls |
| Integrations | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects | Modular speech-to-text and text-to-speech backends (Whisper, Deepgram, Kokoro, ElevenLabs) |
| Languages & capture | Automatic meeting detection on Mac | Model-agnostic: works with OpenAI, Anthropic, and local LLMs via Ollama |
| Best-fit workflow | 60+ language support with automatic detection | Docker-based self-hosting with optional CUDA GPU image |
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
joinly
Choose joinly if you need building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls — strengths include fully open source (mit) and self-hostable for complete data control.
Tana
joinly
It depends on your workflow. Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call, while joinly is strong for building custom ai meeting agents that answer questions and run tasks during live calls. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades and joinly is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.