Tana and iMemo are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. iMemo: Cross-platform AI recorder that turns meetings, lectures, and imported files into searchable transcripts and summaries. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants workflows, shortlist Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most, and iMemo when recording and summarizing in-person and virtual meetings matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Cross-platform AI recorder that turns meetings, lectures, and imported files into searchable transcripts and summaries.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); iMemo is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Tana | iMemo |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio | Records and transcribes meetings, lectures, and interviews on iOS and Android |
| Standout feature | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | Imports audio/video files (MP3, WAV, FLAC, MP4, and more) |
| Team usage | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace | AI summaries from long recordings with action-item identification |
| Integrations | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects | Transcription and dual-language translation across 100+ languages |
| Languages & capture | Automatic meeting detection on Mac | Project and folder organization with advanced search |
| Best-fit workflow | 60+ language support with automatic detection | Export to TXT, PDF, and multiple audio formats |
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
iMemo
Choose iMemo if you need recording and summarizing in-person and virtual meetings — strengths include available on both ios and android, unlike many apple-only rivals.
Tana
iMemo
It depends on your workflow. Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call, while iMemo is strong for recording and summarizing in-person and virtual meetings. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades and iMemo is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.