Tana and aiOla are both AI meeting assistants for recording, transcription, and summaries, compared here on pricing, features, and workflow fit. Tana: AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base. aiOla: Voice AI platform for field teams that captures spoken post-meeting debriefs and pushes data into CRM. They overlap on ai-meeting-assistants, ai-productivity-meeting-tools, so the right pick depends on team size, budget, and which meeting workflows you automate.
How Hosiqo compares and tests toolsFinal recommendation
For ai-meeting-assistants, ai-productivity-meeting-tools workflows, shortlist Tana when transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call matters most, and aiOla when field sales reps dictating post-meeting debriefs into crm matters most. Both record across Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams; trial each on real meetings before committing.
AI workspace with a bot-less meeting notetaker that transcribes and summarizes meetings directly into a connected knowledge base.
Voice AI platform for field teams that captures spoken post-meeting debriefs and pushes data into CRM.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium); aiOla is a free tier with paid upgrades (freemium). Always confirm current pricing on each vendor's site before buying.
| Feature | Tana | aiOla |
|---|---|---|
| Core capability | Bot-less meeting capture using computer system audio | Voice agent for spoken post-meeting field sales debriefs |
| Standout feature | Transcription and AI summaries for online and in-person meetings | Automatic conversion of speech into structured CRM records |
| Team usage | Action items pushed directly to task boards in the workspace | Salesforce and workflow integration for field data |
| Integrations | Links meeting notes to relevant people and projects | Speech recognition tuned for jargon, accents, and noisy environments |
| Languages & capture | Automatic meeting detection on Mac | Prebuilt workflows for inspections, safety, and compliance |
| Best-fit workflow | 60+ language support with automatic detection | Voice agent for spoken post-meeting field sales debriefs |
Tana
Choose Tana if you need transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call — strengths include captures meetings without adding a bot to the call.
aiOla
Choose aiOla if you need field sales reps dictating post-meeting debriefs into crm — strengths include designed for in-person and field sales rather than virtual calls.
Tana
aiOla
It depends on your workflow. Tana is strong for transcribing and summarizing meetings without a bot in the call, while aiOla is strong for field sales reps dictating post-meeting debriefs into crm. Both transcribe and summarize meetings.
Tana is a free tier with paid upgrades and aiOla is a free tier with paid upgrades. Check each vendor's pricing page for the latest plans and free-tier limits.
Yes. Many teams run more than one meeting assistant when the workflows are complementary and the budget is justified.